Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hardy & Merryl McCalman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$143kReligion$138kHealth$125kCommunity Improvement$60kYouth Development$22kRecreation & Sports$9kHousing & Shelter$4kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
DUNWOODY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$18,500
DUNWOODY METHODIST CHURCH$11,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FDN$3,000
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$2,500
PERIMETER NORTH YOUNG LIFE$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$655k · 16 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$655k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+23%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of West Georgia Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +29%
  • TM
    TANNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +21%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • LC
    LUTHERN CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
4
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
10
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Concord Hospital - Franklin

CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
12
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is House of Cherith Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $176,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUNWOODY METHODIST CHURCH: $66,000 · OtherDUNWOODY METHODIST CHURCHDUNWOODY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $34,500 · OtherDUNWOODY SCHOOL FOUNDATIONFERST FOUNDATION OF HARALSON CO: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · Other+10 more: $47,500 · Other+10 moreUniversity of West Georgia Foundation Inc: $120,000 · EducationUniversity of West G…BRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationTANNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · HealthTANNER MEDICAL FOUN…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $32,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCA…Cure Childhood Cancer Inc: $5,000 · HealthCARROLL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Community ImprovementCARROLL CO…YOUNG LIFE: $20,300 · Youth DevelopmentATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionHouse of Cherith Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$353,000Education$125,000Health$117,000Community Improvement$60,000Youth Development$20,300Food & Nutrition$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of West Georgia Foundation Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTANNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCARROLL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Cherith Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of West Georgia Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TANNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BRENAU UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds House of Cherith Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hardy & Merryl McCalman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hardy & Merryl McCalman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hardy & Merryl McCalman Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hardy & Merryl McCalman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hardy & Merryl McCalman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph