Skip to content

· Public charity

Hansjorg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard Univ Inc

Formed as a supporting organization of president and fellows of harvard college to conduct, support and develop research and inventions in the life sciences and engineering.

$9.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$39MScience & Tech$21MEducation$9.2MFood & Nutrition$1.8MRecreation & Sports$253kArts & Culture$54k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $9,249,939, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,605,705 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $355,766 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $639k
  • $250k+8 grants · $8.6M
$1,051,207
Median grant
3
States reached
$479M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATTIVARE THERAPEUTICS INC$1,693,161
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,375,366
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$1,173,360
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$1,102,639
THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,096,260
ENPLUSONE BIOSCIENCES INC$1,051,207
THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC$858,606
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$260,039
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$196,291
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$193,258
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$164,224
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$85,528
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ENPLUSONE BIOSCIENCES INC: $1.1M → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation: $1.9M → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $491k → 10%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $2.4M → 7%Metis Foundation: $1.2M → 16%J Craig Venter Institute: $857k → 8%University of Maryland Baltimore: $3.0M → 19%Children's Hospital Corporation: $1.8M → 16%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $2.0M → 7%Metis Foundation: $499k → 16%J Craig Venter Institute: $717k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $1.2M → 16%J Craig Venter Institute: $600k → 8%ATTIVARE THERAPEUTICS INC: $1.7M → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation: $1.1M → 16%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $5.0M → 17%J Craig Venter Institute: $503k → 8%ATTIVARE THERAPEUTICS INC: $844k → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation: $902k → 16%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $1.7M → 8%THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC: $859k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1.7M → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $855k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1.4M → 8%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $837k → 16%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $1.2M → 8%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $805k → 16%READCOOR INC: $1.1M → 8%Children's Hospital Corporation: $698k → 16%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $509k → 8%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $648k → 16%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $601k → 16%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $566k → 16%The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc: $497k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $1.1M → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $795k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $740k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $733k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $647k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $605k → 16%Trustees of Boston University: $544k → 16%THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.5M → 16%The Massachusetts General Hospital: $1.2M → 16%THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $1.1M → 16%The Massachusetts General Hospital: $917k → 16%The Massachusetts General Hospital: $721k → 16%The Massachusetts General Hospital: $619k → 16%Emulate Inc: $1.2M → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
MD
AZ
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 31 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
7

Total granted

$59M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+16%

Still filing today

58%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +91%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +39%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • EI
    Emulate Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1.2M
  • RI
    READCOOR INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.1M
  • AS
    ADAPTIVE SURFACE TECH INC (FORMERLY SLIPS TECH
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Tufts College; the most unlike its peers is The Cloud Artscience Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
24/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $7,060,123 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $5,641,733 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $3,112,644 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,750,906 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYATTIVARE THERAPEUTICS INC: $2,536,724 · OtherATTIVARE THERAPEUTICS INCEmulate Inc: $1,179,844 · OtherREADCOOR INC: $1,114,260 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1,062,556 · OtherENPLUSONE BIOSCIENCES INC: $1,051,207 · Other+11 more: $2,328,413 · Other+11 moreMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $7,444,082 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of T…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $5,986,932 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT …Trustees of Tufts College: $1,098,478 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College+10 more: $3,349,093 · Education+10 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $8,925,364 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporat…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,674,979 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute…METIS FOUNDATION: $1,830,113 · HealthMETIS FOUNDATIONBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $677,821 · Health+3 more: $563,884 · HealthCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $4,541,383 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING …J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $3,055,366 · Science & TechJ CRAIG VENT…+1 more: $30,000 · Science & Tech
Other$27,838,410Education$17,878,585Health$17,672,161Science & Tech$7,626,749

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $8,925,364 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $7,444,082 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $5,986,932 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,674,979 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $4,541,383 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $3,055,366 over 7y, 12% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,750,906 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMETIS FOUNDATION: $1,830,113 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $1,098,478 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $677,821 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $558,621 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $481,408 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $452,847 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $441,797 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $435,777 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $390,635 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $376,106 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $303,045 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $267,485 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLOUD ARTSCIENCE FOUNDATION: $126,501 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $55,862 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNUCLEATE BIO INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $23,109 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $21,287 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds METIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds THE CLOUD ARTSCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY ↗
  • Who funds University of Louisville Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NUCLEATE BIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Johns Hopkins UniversityMD12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hansjorg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard Univ Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hansjorg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard Univ Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hansjorg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard Univ’s filings →

More from the funding graph