Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hands of 10ve Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$207k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$76kHealth$60kEducation$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$10kCrime & Legal$10kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$625k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$69,000
National College Resources Foundati$30,486
LAPD Personnel State of Emergency$30,000
Tellurian Inc$20,000
Costco$11,022
Individual grant recipient$10,120
Bakersfield Police Activities League$10,000
UnityPoint Health Meriter Foundation$5,245
Brown County Coalition for Suicide$5,150
Nerd HQ$5,000
House of Hope GB$5,000
Ground Zero Athletics via Poppy Rose$2,500
Misc$2,030
Dicks Sporting Goods$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%National College Resources Foundati: $30k → 14%Misc: $2k → 14%SALT Kern County: $14k → 18%Fellowship of Christian Athletes Coastal Plains: $1k → 15%House of Hope GB: $5k → 10%UnityPoint Health Meriter Foundation: $5k → 10%Flexwork Sports: $69k → 11%Dicks Sporting Goods: $1k → 11%National College Resources Foundati: $15k → 14%SALT Kern County: $10k → 18%House of Hope GB: $5k → 10%Tellurian Inc: $20k → 10%Dicks Sporting Goods: $1k → 11%Nerd HQ: $5k → 14%Bakersfield Police Activities League: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Hands of 10ve Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hands of 10ve Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 6 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$107k
$8k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $24k
  • C
    Costco
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k

Funded once

  • BF
    BamFam Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k
  • BB
    Big Brother Big Sister Family
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $69,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAPD Personnel State of Emergency: $30,000 · OtherLAPD Personnel State of EmergencyIndividual grant recipient: $23,919 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCostco: $19,225 · OtherCostcoHouse of Hope GB: $10,010 · OtherHouse of Hope GBBrown County Coalition for Suicide: $6,184 · Other+7 more: $14,756 · Other+7 moreNATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION: $45,486 · EducationNATIONAL COLLEGE RE…TELLURIAN INC: $20,000 · HealthTELLURIAN …NERD HQ: $5,000 · HealthNERD HQBakersfield Police Activities League: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMERITER FOUNDATION INC: $5,245 · Philanthropy
Other$173,094Education$45,486Health$25,000Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$5,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION: $45,486 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBakersfield Police Activities League: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNERD HQ: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE RESOURCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Bakersfield Police Activities League ↗
  • Who funds MERITER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NERD HQ ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hands of 10ve Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hands of 10ve Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hands of 10ve Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hands of 10ve Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hands of 10ve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph