Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haley B Bear Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$49kReligion$35kHealth$26kFood & Nutrition$17kEducation$14kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
8
States reached
$879k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARENET$6,350
MADISON AREA FOOD PANTRY GARDEN$5,156
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,510
CONSORTIUM OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$3,500
CATHOLIC MULTICULTERAL CENTER$3,000
DAUGHTERS OF THE PIETA$2,950
DIOCESE OF MADISON$2,500
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$2,400
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,400
THE ROAD HOME$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ACCESS HEALTH$1,500
RED CROSS$1,500
SECTOR67$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WI: $600 → 7%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $800 → 10%MADISON AREA FOOD PANTRY GARDEN: $5k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $800 → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $308 → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $250 → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 30 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
9

Total granted

$172k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-2%

Still filing today

33%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementReligionArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +9%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • SI
    SECTOR67 INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • CM
    CATHOLIC MULTICUTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • UC
    UW CARBONE PANCREAS CANCER TASK FORCE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Dane County Inc

Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.

—
2
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
5
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
6
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
7
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
9
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
10
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
United States of America National Comm of the Int'l Dairy Fed Inc

The mission of the united states national committee of the international dairy federation is to represent the us dairy sector worldwide by providing the best global source of scientific expertise and knowledge in support of the development…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts for All Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is SECTOR67 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARENET: $33,650 · OtherCARENETFOOD PANTRY GARDEN: $12,000 · OtherFOOD PANTRY GARDENDAUGHTERS OF THE PIETA: $11,950 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF THE PIETAST VINCENT DE PAUL: $9,880 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULDIOCESE OF MADISON: $7,500 · Other+32 more: $80,067 · Other+32 moreTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC: $7,200 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD …Madison Area Food Pantry Gardens: $5,156 · Human ServicesMadison A…Foster the Village Inc: $2,158 · Human ServicesFoster th…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesAmerican …DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN OF THE HEART-GREATER LACROSSE AREA INC: $600 · Human ServicesTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $8,400 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,400 · HealthSECTOR67 INC: $5,500 · Community ImprovementZETEO COMMUNITY INC: $4,545 · ReligionArts for All Wisconsin Inc: $3,618 · Arts & Culture
Other$155,047Human Services$16,614Education$8,400Health$6,400Community Improvement$5,500Religion$4,545Arts & Culture$3,618

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $8,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECTOR67 INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetZETEO COMMUNITY INC: $4,545 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetArts for All Wisconsin Inc: $3,618 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoster the Village Inc: $2,158 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMAYDM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOpportunity Resources Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SECTOR67 INC ↗
  • Who funds Madison Area Food Pantry Gardens ↗
  • Who funds ZETEO COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Arts for All Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Foster the Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAYDM INC ↗
  • Who funds Opportunity Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Gas and Electric Foundation IncWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Trustage Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · M3 Insurance Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haley B Bear Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haley B Bear Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Haley B Bear Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Haley B Bear Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haley B Bear’s filings →

    More from the funding graph