Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gwenjosh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$174kEducation$157kArts & Culture$124kRecreation & Sports$63kAnimals$31kEmployment$22kHuman Services$21kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEKAB BE BIBLIOTECA USA$41,553
WHEATON COLLEGE$15,000
THE GENDER DISTRICT$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO SPIKES$10,000
CTE AT TAMALPAIS HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
PACIFIC CENTER FOR HUMAN GROWTH$5,000
LGBT ASYLUM PROJECT$5,000
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,000
GENDER LAW CENTER$5,000
LYRIC$5,000
TULUM FOOD SUPPORT$3,000
SHELDRICK TRUST USA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$583k · 12 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$583k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+1859%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WHEATON COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $122k · revenue +25%
  • TS
    The Spahr Center
    4× · 2020–2023 · $21k · revenue +131%
  • THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BO
    BEACHMUTTS ORGANIZATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue ×20
  • MS
    MONARCHS SOCCER CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • AH
    AVALON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
Merced Lgbtq Alliance

The mission of the Merced LGBTQ+ Alliance is to advocate for the interests of the LGBTQ+ community within Merced County. We celebrate our diversity and advocate for justice and opportunities for members of our vulnerable community. We…

Education
4
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
5
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
6
Los Angeles Lgbt Center

Building a world where lgbt people thrive as healthy, equal and complete members of society. since its inception, the los angeles lgbt center (center) has been building a world where lgbt people thrive as healthy, equal and complete…

—
7
Coastpride Inc

Coastpride is an organization created by our local community in san mateo county to improve the support, visibility, and awareness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (lgbtq) individuals and families.coastpride embraces…

Health
8
Mental Health Association of San Francisco

The mission of the mental health association of san francisco is to cultivate peer leadership, build community, and advance social justice in mental health.

Health
9
Openhouse

Openhouse enables San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ+ seniors to overcome the unique challenges they face as they age by providing housing, direct services and community programs. (continued on Schedule O)

Housing & Shelter
10
The Attic Youth Center

The attic youth center creates opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (lgbtq) youth to develop into healthy, independent, civic-minded adults within a safe and supportive community, and promotes the…

Youth Development
11
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
12
Pomona Valley Pride

Pomona Valley Pride advances the well-being of LGBTQIA2S+ individuals and allies through affirming support services, educational and arts programming, advocacy, collaborative partnerships, and community-centered initiatives that empower…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lavender Youth Recreation & Information Center Inc Lyric; the most unlike its peers is Beachmutts Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEKAB BE BIBLIOTECA USA: $164,385 · OtherHEKAB BE BIBLIOTECA USACTE AT TAMALPAIS HIGH SCHOOL: $120,000 · OtherCTE AT TAMALPAIS HIGH SCHOOLSAN FRANCISCO SPIKES: $50,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO SPIKESIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherThe Spahr Center: $21,000 · Other+10 more: $75,771 · Other+10 moreWHEATON COLLEGE: $122,000 · EducationWHEATON COLLEGEGame Academy: $35,000 · EducationGame AcademyBEACHMUTTS ORGANIZATION: $15,000 · AnimalsMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE TRANSGENDER DISTRICT: $10,000 · Civil RightsTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$453,156Education$157,000Animals$17,000Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHEATON COLLEGE: $122,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SPIKES: $50,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetGame Academy: $35,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetThe Spahr Center: $21,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Center for Human Growth: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SPIKES ↗
  • Who funds Game Academy ↗
  • Who funds The Spahr Center ↗
  • Who funds BEACHMUTTS ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSGENDER DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Center for Human Growth ↗
  • Who funds LAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Horizons FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Horizons Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gwenjosh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gwenjosh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Wheaton College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gwenjosh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gwenjosh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gwenjosh’s filings →

More from the funding graph