Skip to content

· Private foundation

Guy & Olive Lookabaugh Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$302kHuman Services$193kPublic Safety & Disaster$172kArts & Culture$60kHousing & Shelter$36kInternational$36kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$230
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$6,037
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FDN OF THE TX HILL COUNTR$100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$21,476
ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$7,970
Individual grant recipient$6,037
Individual grant recipient$5,437
Individual grant recipient$5,427
Individual grant recipient$2,666
Individual grant recipient$1,220
Individual grant recipient$230
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVETION SERVICES: $10k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $40k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
OH
CT
CA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$552k · 9 repeat orgs$240k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$552k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+16%

Still filing today

22%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2018–2025 · $183k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $133k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $72k

Funded once

  • C
    CHILDSAFEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +485%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
3
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
4
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
10
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Foundation

The mission of the acvim foundation is to eliminate animal and human disease by supporting discovery, education, and partnerships throughout the global community of medicine.

—
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alamo Colleges Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Americares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $182,661 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $132,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCOMMUNITY FDN OF THE TX HILL COUNTR: $100,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FDN OF THE TX HILL COUNTRAMERICAN RED CROSS: $72,431 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSouthwestern College Foundation: $70,516 · OtherSouthwestern College FoundationKERRVILLE ARTS AND CULTURAL FDN: $30,000 · Other+8 more: $55,847 · Other+8 moreCHILDSAFE: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $18,000 · InternationalHILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureVILLA MUSICA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Health
Other$643,955Human Services$50,000Education$40,000International$36,000Arts & Culture$30,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthwestern College Foundation: $70,516 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDSAFE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA MUSICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southwestern College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VILLA MUSICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guy & Olive Lookabaugh Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guy & Olive Lookabaugh Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Guy & Olive Lookabaugh’s filings →

More from the funding graph