Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gutnick Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$174kPhilanthropy$74kRecreation & Sports$28kYouth Development$16kEducation$8kHuman Services$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,630
Median grant
2
States reached
$357k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH$3,700
CHEDER CHABAD INC$2,180
CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL$1,630
OHOLEI TORAH$1,020
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES 1000$1,006
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH: $4k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $2k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 12 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$222k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-8%

Still filing today

25%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $54k
  • CH
    CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue +3%
  • CY
    CHABAD YOUTH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $24k

Funded once

  • BM
    BNOS MENACHEM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • SK
    SICHOS KODESH PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +127%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
8
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
9
Mikvah Yisrael of Passaic & Clifton

Operation of a jewish ritual bath

—
10
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
11
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taharas Hamishpacha Organization Inc; the most unlike its peers is Agudas Taharas Hamishpacha of Crown Heights - Crown Heights Mikva Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC: $54,000 · OtherUNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INCCHABAD YOUTH: $23,600 · OtherCHABAD YOUTHMISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $22,398 · OtherMISC ORGANIZED CHARITIESCAMP GAN ISRAEL INC: $20,215 · OtherCAMP GAN ISRAEL INCCONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL: $15,430 · OtherCONGREGATION EZRAS YISROELCHABAD LUBAVITCH CENTER: $14,600 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH CENTERBNOS MENACHEM INC: $14,500 · OtherBNOS MENACHEM INCMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES 1000: $11,296 · OtherSICHOS KODESH PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WEST SIDE INC: $9,300 · OtherCAMP EMUNAH: $7,950 · Other+13 more: $35,200 · Other+13 moreCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCROWN HEIGHTS …FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $8,400 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Network of Florida Inc: $6,000 · ReligionAgudas Taharas Hamishpacha of Crown Heights - Crown Heights Mikva Inc: $1,000 · ReligionTaharas Hamishpacha Organization Inc: $1,000 · ReligionTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $3,700 · Human ServicesKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $3,600 · Human ServicesNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $4,500 · Education
Other$238,489Philanthropy$40,000Youth Development$8,400Religion$8,000Human Services$7,300Education$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL INC: $20,215 over 5y, 20% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $8,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Network of Florida Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $3,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAgudas Taharas Hamishpacha of Crown Heights - Crown Heights Mikva Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTaharas Hamishpacha Organization Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GAN ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Network of Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah ↗
  • Who funds Agudas Taharas Hamishpacha of Crown Heights - Crown Heights Mikva Inc ↗
  • Who funds Taharas Hamishpacha Organization Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lets Make It Happen Ny IncNY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Maon Noam Inc · Barber Family Foundation · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana · Regals Foundation · Keren Tzemed

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gutnick Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gutnick Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gutnick Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gutnick Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gutnick’s filings →

More from the funding graph