Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$169k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.7MCivil Rights$1.1MFood & Nutrition$887kHealth$751kHuman Services$745kAnimals$718kReligion$700kEducation$444kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $342k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $774k
$30,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$169,335
HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INC$144,000
STAND WITH US$114,500
CHINOOK HORSES$64,864
Individual grant recipient$60,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$59,603
MONTANA JEWISH PROJECT$56,500
EDUCATION PARTNERS NIGERIA INC$55,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$50,000
EZRA UGANDA ASSISTANCE CO RABBI LEILA GAL BERNER$35,000
RETURN TO FREEDOM$34,000
2LIFE COMMUNITIES$31,500
SPOONFULS$30,864
ALL SEATED IN A BARN$30,000
FOR THE LOVE OF ARIA$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX: $20k → 10%ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Gt Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Gt Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 46 repeat orgs$578k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
27

Total granted

$6.9M
$494k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+35%

Still filing today

61%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SPOONFULS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +162%
  • EP
    EDUCATION PARTNERS NIGERIA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $324k · revenue +70% · 51% of their budget
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $280k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • H
    HADASSAH
    one grant, 2017 · $63k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $63k
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $63k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
6
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
7
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
8
Farm Forward Inc

To develop and implement strategies to promote more humane, sustainable, community-friendly food choices and advance animal agriculture with special attention to animal protection issues.

Animals
9
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Mazon a Jewish Response to Hunger

Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel. See Schedule O for more details.

—
12
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heading Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Education Partners Nigeria. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
37/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,041,500 · OtherHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INCEZRA UGANDA ASSISTANCE CO RABBI LEILA GAL BERNER: $365,500 · OtherEZRA UGANDA ASSISTANCE CO RABBI LEILA GAL BERNERIndividual grant recipient: $307,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SAN DIEGO: $303,332 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SAN DIEGOIndividual grant recipient: $293,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANINE COMPANIONS: $286,103 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $271,910 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSERADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $230,000 · OtherMontana Jewish Project: $208,500 · Other+43 more: $1,776,549 · Other+43 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,045,473 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORL…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $279,644 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALL…COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $159,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURA…+4 more: $96,622 · International+4 moreSPOONFULS: $630,382 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $49,000 · Food & NutritionEDUCATION PARTNERS NIGERIA: $324,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $49,246 · EducationMERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $27,750 · Education+2 more: $13,900 · EducationCAMP FREEDOM INC: $300,000 · Recreation & SportsRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $133,500 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $77,552 · AnimalsALL SEATED IN A BARN: $30,000 · AnimalsFOR THE LOVE OF ARIA: $30,000 · AnimalsMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,944 · AnimalsAnimal Pad: $10,000 · AnimalsCHINOOK HORSES: $182,919 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $25,000 · HealthPROJECT HOPE INC: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $12,511 · Health
Other$5,083,894International$1,580,739Food & Nutrition$679,382Education$414,896Recreation & Sports$300,000Animals$291,996Health$230,430

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1,045,473 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSPOONFULS: $630,382 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetEDUCATION PARTNERS NIGERIA: $324,000 over 7y, 51% of budgetCAMP FREEDOM INC: $300,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $279,644 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMontana Jewish Project: $208,500 over 4y, 28% of budgetCHINOOK HORSES: $182,919 over 4y, 27% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $159,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $133,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $109,642 over 8y, 0.1% of budget2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $81,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $77,552 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $68,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $62,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANNA ON MAIN STREET: $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVeterans For Child Rescue Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $52,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $50,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $49,246 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $49,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE LOVE OF ARIA: $30,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetMERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $27,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDOC EMET PRODUCTIONS INC: $27,500 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $25,934 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE MAIN LINE: $24,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetThe Houston Audubon Society: $24,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTORAH RELIEF SOCIETY INC EZRAS TORAH FUND: $22,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $16,622 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $14,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MILFORD INC: $13,629 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $11,433 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,944 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Pad: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetERIC PAREDES SAVE A LIFE FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $7,511 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEADING HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION PARTNERS NIGERIA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Montana Jewish Project ↗
  • Who funds CHINOOK HORSES ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans For Child Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Boston Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Project Hope Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Heading Home Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Action for Boston Community Development Inc: 11% of income from government
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • United Way of Milford Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gt’s filings →

More from the funding graph