Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gsb Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$108kPhilanthropy$100kHuman Services$34kHealth$21kFood & Nutrition$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kMembership Benefit$14kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$650k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC$25,000
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$7,000
VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION$5,000
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,500
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$3,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC$2,500
THE CYCLE EFFECT$2,000
WALKING MOUNTAINS$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $5k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $5k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $3k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $2k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $2k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $150 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CO
WV
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$167k · 10 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
23

Total granted

$167k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+38%

Still filing today

70%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +129%
  • VV
    Vail Valley Charitable Fund Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $16k · revenue +135%
  • Y
    YOUTHPOWER365
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -47%
  • VM
    Vail Memorial Park Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue 0%
  • NA
    National Alliance On Mental Illness
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
2
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
3
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
Valley View Hospital Association

Caring for you and your family, one patient at a time.

Health
6
Eagle Valley Mental Health

Eagle valley mental health (dba eagle valley behavioral health) primarily serves the behavioral health care needs of eagle county, and secondarily the region surrounding eagle county.

Health
7
Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc

The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.

Health
8
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
10
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center

Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.

Health
11
Val Verde Hospital Corporation

Mission: we live to deliver healthcare our community can trust. vision: to be the premier provider for all healthcare needs. legacy: we strengthen our foundation through empowerment. core values: trust: we create trust through our…

Health
12
Vail-Summit Research & Education Foundat
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Vail Memorial Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPublic University Foundatio…Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Youth CampsAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support ServicesVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCommunity Health CentersLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,083 · EducationWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDA…SEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC — $6,500 · EducationSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC+3 more — $4,300 · EducationCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $96,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS …YOUTHPOWER365 — $10,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTHPOWER365+1 more — $3,500 · PhilanthropyNational Alliance On Mental Illness — $12,500 · OtherNational Alliance On Menta…JUPITER 1ST CHURCH — $11,000 · OtherJUPITER 1ST CHURCHAMERICAN RED CROSS — $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSTHE SALVATION ARMY VAIL — $7,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY VAILTHE GATEHOUSE — $3,333 · OtherVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUND…LOXAHATCHEE GUILD INC — $5,400 · OtherLOXAHATCHEE GUILD INCPROJECTHANDUP — $5,000 · OtherPROJECTHANDUPVETGROUP INC — $4,500 · OtherFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc — $4,000 · Other+17 more — $22,075 · Other+17 moreVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc — $16,150 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionVail Memorial Park Foundation — $14,000 · Membership BenefitVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $9,500 · Community Improvement
Education$115,883Philanthropy$109,750Other$90,308Human Services$21,750Food & Nutrition$20,000Membership Benefit$14,000Community Improvement$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,083 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $96,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc — $16,150 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetVail Memorial Park Foundation — $14,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNational Alliance On Mental Illness — $12,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365 — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE GUILD INC — $5,400 over 1y, 14% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETGROUP INC — $4,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc — $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUANTUM HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Slifer Family Foundation · United Way of Eagle River Valley · Vail Valley Foundation · The Precourt Foundation · Frechette Family Foundation · The Tang Fund · United Jewish Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gsb Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Vetgroup Inc0% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gsb Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gsb Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph