Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Griffin Hospital

GRIFFIN HOSPITAL is committed to providing personalized, humanistic, consumer-driven health care in a healing environment, to empowering individuals to be actively involved in decisions affecting their care and well-being through access to information and education.

$647k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$312k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$651kArts & Culture$344kPhilanthropy$228kYouth Development$127kFood & Nutrition$107kHousing & Shelter$51kHealth$35k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $564,074 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $647,087 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $83,013 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $205k
  • $250k+1 grant · $312k
$77,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$209M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAM INC$312,212
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY$127,212
VALLEY UNITED WAY INCORPORATED$77,500
CITY OF DERBY$37,150
MASONIC CHARITY FOUNDATION OF CT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 4 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEAM INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $651k · revenue +37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $327k
  • VU
    VALLEY UNITED WAY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $228k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • TO
    TOWN OF DERBY
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • VS
    Valley Shakespeare Festival
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
2
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
3
Saratoga Regional Ymca

The Saratoga Regional YMCA is a charitable association that is dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation

To support its member healthcare organizations further innovation and excellence in patient care, teaching, and research.

Health
6
Valley Shore Ymca Inc

The mission of the Valley Shore YMCA, Inc. is to develop and encourage the growth of all individuals in spirit, mind and body in an atmosphere of mutual respect. Our areas of focus are youth development, healthy living and social…

Human Services
7
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care Ii

Vns health home care is part of one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional…

Health
8
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
9
United Hospital Fund of New York

Working to build an effective and equitable health care system for every new yorker. (see sch. o)

Health
10
Ymca of Westfield Nj

The westfield area ymca is a nonprofit human service organization dedicated to developing the full potential of every individual and family in the communities it serves through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
11
Visiting Nurse & Community Health Inc

We are committed to providing the highest quality, compassionate home care to the patients entrusted to us. We are also steadfast in our pledge to be a responsive and innovative advocate for the communities we serve, focusing on health…

12
Lehigh Valley Physician Group

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health education, injury prevention, and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Valley Shakespeare Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEAM INC — $651,066 · Human ServicesTEAM INCIndividual grant recipient — $327,491 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASTERS TABLE COMMUNITY MEALS INC — $107,173 · OtherMASTERS TABLE COMMUNITY MEALS INCCITY OF DERBY — $37,150 · OtherCITY OF DERBY+2 more — $24,500 · OtherVALLEY UNITED WAY INC — $227,500 · PhilanthropyVALLEY UNITED WA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY — $127,212 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…American Heart Association Inc — $15,000 · HealthBHcare Inc — $10,000 · HealthMasonic Charity Foundation of CT — $10,000 · HealthWATERBURY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$651,066Other$496,314Philanthropy$227,500Youth Development$127,212Health$35,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEAM INC — $651,066 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetVALLEY UNITED WAY INC — $227,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY — $127,212 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetValley Shakespeare Festival — $11,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBHcare Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMasonic Charity Foundation of CT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATERBURY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Valley Community Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Valley Community Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Griffin Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Team Inc84% of income from government
  • BHcare Inc68% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of the Lower Naugatuck Valley19% of income from government
  • Valley Shakespeare Festival4% of income from government
  • Waterbury Symphony Orchestra Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph