Skip to content
Gregg-Strimenos Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Gregg-Strimenos Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$133kCrime & Legal$110kEducation$43kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$25kRecreation & Sports$22kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CEN$20,000
CAMP BOGGY CREEK$16,000
BEACON COLLEGE$6,000
ONE DEGREE FORWARD INC$4,500
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION$3,500
TRIANGLE GRAPPLERS$1,500
MISSION 823$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $3k → 10%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $3k → 10%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $2k → 10%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $2k → 10%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $2k → 10%HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES I: $1k → 10%SUNRISEARC INC: $7k → 10%SUNRISEARC INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$390k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
-36%

Still filing today

82%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +87%
  • BC
    BEACON COLLEGE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +117%
  • FP
    FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +410%

Funded once

  • HL
    HOOPS LIFE CARES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -98%
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue -36%
  • AF
    A FOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $400 · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
2
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
3
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
4
Lake County Animal Services Dba Orphan Dog Rescue

We provide emergency medical services, spays ands neuters for animals in need.

—
5
South Florida Beagle Rescue Inc

beagle rescue

Animals
6
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
7
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
8
Home Fur Good Animal Rescue and Placement

To eliminate euthanasia of treatable, adoptable dogs and cats in maricopa county through adoption, medical care, promotion of spay & neuter and owner education. hfg also operates a low-cost vaccine/microchip clinic each week to provide…

Animals
9
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
10
Lake County Humane Society

Animal shelter/pet adoptions

—
11
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Blue Waters Dog Rescue

We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Sumter Children's Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Forever Home Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $117,200 · HealthTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC+1 more: $500 · HealthLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $110,180 · Crime & LegalLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY…BEACON COLLEGE INC: $43,000 · OtherBEACON COLLEGE INCONE DEGREE FORWARD INC: $23,900 · OtherONE DEGREE FORWARD INCTHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $15,000 · OtherTHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTR…+2 more: $2,500 · OtherFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $25,100 · Youth DevelopmentFORWARD PATH…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP O…HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES INC: $13,297 · Human ServicesSUNRISEARC INC: $11,606 · Human ServicesMission 823 Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $9,000 · AnimalsA FOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $400 · Animals
Health$117,700Crime & Legal$110,180Other$84,400Youth Development$45,100Human Services$26,903Animals$9,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $117,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $110,180 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetBEACON COLLEGE INC: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $25,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES INC: $13,297 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISEARC INC: $11,606 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMission 823 Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOOPS LIFE CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA FOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUMTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF LAKE AND SUMTER COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission 823 Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOOPS LIFE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A FOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kristin Pooh Mason Fo…Mount Dora Community …Amazonsmile Foundation
Kristin Pooh Mason Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kristin Pooh Mason Foundation Inc · Mount Dora Community Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gregg-Strimenos Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gregg-Strimenos Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Beacon College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregg-Strimenos’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home