How much did GREENWOOD COUNTY COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of GREENWOOD COUNTY COMMUNITY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $45k
$10k–50k23 grants · $390k
$50k–250k8 grants · $689k
$250k+1 grant · $435k

$15,407

Median grant

States reached

$27M

Total assets

Largest grants

HOSPICECARE OF THE PIEDMONT$434,958
MISC$246,342
WATER OF LIFE$100,000
NEWSPRING CHURCH$65,000
ST MARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
MATTHEW 2540$60,000
SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FDN$57,704
GREENWOOD GLOBAL METH CHURCH$50,000
GREENWOOD GENETIC CENTER$50,000
A PLACE FOR US$35,300
PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION$30,000
ZOE EMPOWERS$27,000
CONNIE MAXWELL$25,000
PIEDMONT AGENCY ON AGING$25,000
SERGE$22,200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $769k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.7M · 34 repeat orgs$616k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.7M

$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+29%

Still filing today

35%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PH
PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $634k · revenue +18%
GP
GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE
8× · 2017–2024 · $523k · revenue +73%
WO
WATER OF LIFE
6× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +147%

Funded once

FC
FIDELITY CHARITABLE
one grant, 2022 · $85k
GL
GWD LIONS CLUB FDN
one grant, 2019 · $53k
FF
FOUNDATION FOR A GREATER GREENWOOD
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -84% · 71% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Greenwood Pathway House Foundation

Foundation to invest legacy gifts restricted to benefit greenwood pathway house inc (ein 45-0833715) located in greenwood, sc. pathway house's mission is to help homeless persons navigate a pathway to physical, financial, and social…

Philanthropy

Greenwood County Community

To inspire and encourage philanthropy which improves the lives of current and future residents of greenwood county.

Community Improvement

Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education

The Greenville Community Shelters

To serve the homeless and those at risk of homelessness by providing safe housing and assisting them in developing a long-term plan that leads to self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter

Greater Greenwood United Ministry

The mission of greater greenwood united ministry is to remain a partnership of denominations, community groups, and christian congregations whose mission is to assist those in need in the loving manner of jesus christ.

Human Services

Greenwood Home

To provide group home residential living and social services for disabled residents.

Human Services

Meals on Wheels of Greenville Endowment Fund Inc

Philanthropy

Greenwood Genetic Center Foundation

The greenwood genetic center foundation was established to serve as the philanthropic arm supporting the greenwood genetic center in their work of serving families in the fight against genetic diseases, birth defects, and autism.

Philanthropy

South Carolina Christian Foundation

South carolina christian foundation exists to disciple the hearts of individuals toward biblical stewardship and proactive philanthropy in order to transform communities and advance the kingdom of god.

Religion

Greater Greenville Housing & Revitalizat

Develop, provide, and promote safe, affordable, and decent housing and design, research, and/or promote revitalization activities and facilitate the coordination of various service and support activities for the greater Greenville…

Community Improvement

Meals On Wheels of Greenville Inc

Meals on wheels of greenville, inc. enhances the quality of life of homebound individuals by providing nutritious meals, personal contact, and related services.

Food & Nutrition

Greenwood Wildlife Rehabilitation Center

The center is devoted to the rehabilitation and release of orphaned and injured wildlife. the center also provides outreach programs focused on rehabilitation and humane solutions to human-wildlife conflicts.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwood Pathway House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emerald City Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

10%

341/3,267

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

15/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,560,329Human Services$773,856Housing & Shelter$522,973International$189,875Health$140,400Philanthropy$92,817Youth Development$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Countybank FoundationSC24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Countybank Foundation · Davis Family Foundation Inc · Wilbur S Smith and Margaret · Central Carolina Community · Duke Energy Foundation · The Barnabus Fund · Julia Porter Scurry Family · Ascend Cares Foundation · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GREENWOOD COUNTY COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MATTHEW 2540.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 621480758 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MATTHEW 2540, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 80% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Greenwood County Community?

Find your warmest path to Greenwood County Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GREENWOOD COUNTY COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greenwood County Community?

More from the funding graph

GREENWOOD COUNTY COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greenwood County Community?

More from the funding graph