Skip to content

· Public charity

Greenroots Inc

Greenroots works to achieve environmental justice and greater quality of life through collective action, unity, education and youth leadership across neighborhoods and communities.

$633k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$520k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$520kArts & Culture$35kCivil Rights$26kHuman Services$20kHealth$15kCommunity Improvement$11kEnvironment$9kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $605,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $633,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
  • $250k+1 grant · $520k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF CHELSEA$520,000
REVIVAL INTERNATIONAL CENTER CHELSEA$15,000
YOUTH ELEMENTO$15,000
THEATREZONE INC DBA APOLLINAIRE THEATRE COMPANY$12,000
CHELSEA COLLAB - LA COLABORATIVA$10,000
CHELSEA BLACK COMMUNITY$10,000
CHELSEA COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$8,000
STORIES INSPIRING MOVEMENTS$8,000
JEWISH CHELSEA MUSEUM INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHELSEA COLLAB - LA COLABORATIVA: $10k → 16%CHELSEA COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $8k → 16%MAVERICK LANDING COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
2
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
3
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
4
Masscreative Inc

Masscreative advocates for a well-resourced and equitable creative sector essential to the economic and civic vibrancy of massachusetts. working with its organizational and individual members, masscreative advances the public policy,…

Arts & Culture
5
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
6
Alternatives for Community and Environment Inc

Ace builds the power of communities of color and low-income communities in massachusetts to eradicate environmental racism and classism, create healthy, sustainable communities, and achieve environmental justice.

Community Improvement
7
Boston Food Forest Coalition

At the intersection of racial equity and climate resilience, the boston food forest coalition is a community of neighbors transforming vacant lots into public edible parks called "food forests" for permanent protection and community…

—
8
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
9
Massachusetts Regional Employment Board Association

The massachusetts workforce association (mwa) is a statewide membership association that leads, advocates and convenes on behalf of the massachusetts workforce development system.

Employment
10
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
11
Urban Guild Inc

The corporation is organized to improve the quality of life in bostons urban communities by building capacity, environmental health, and providing economic opportunity in a manner that responds directly to community needs, interests, and…

Community Improvement
12
Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc

Mira coalition's mission is to convene, serve, and organize together with our members, community leaders, and allies for the advancement of all immigrants across the commonwealth and beyond. mira coalition places immigrant and refugee…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Third Sector New England Inc; the most unlike its peers is Theatrezone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CHELSEA: $520,000 · OtherCITY OF CHELSEA+4 more: $45,500 · Other+4 moreLA COLABORATIVA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesMAVERICK LANDING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,750 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC: $17,500 · Civil RightsTHEATREZONE INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureZUMIX INC: $1,250 · Arts & CultureCHELSEA BLACK COMMUNITY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementMYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHEHARBORKEEPERS: $4,000 · Food & NutritionEASTIE FARM INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC: $1,250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$565,500Human Services$19,750Civil Rights$17,500Arts & Culture$13,250Community Improvement$11,000Environment$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAVERICK LANDING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetZUMIX INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA25.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Barr Foundation · The East Boston Foundation · Health Resources in Action Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greenroots Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greenroots Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • North Suffolk Community Services Inc: 63% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Mystic River Watershed Association Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Maverick Landing Community Services Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Eastie Farm Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Zumix Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Theatrezone Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Chelsea Black Community: 3% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Greenroots Inc?

Find your warmest path to Greenroots Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenroots’ filings →

More from the funding graph