Skip to content

· Private foundation

Green Edith Dee Charitable Trust C

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$131kHealth$117kHuman Services$85kPhilanthropy$48kReligion$26kCrime & Legal$12kAnimals$8kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$80,000
BOX ELDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$13,000
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-MCKAY-DEE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Sylas Project: $6k → 13%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $80k → 12%CCAI: $35k → 8%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
AR
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 7 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$319k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+8%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +0%
  • NI
    Naval Intelligence Professionals
    3× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +15%
  • UA
    UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • C
    CCAI
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue -18%
  • PB
    POLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • AI
    ASPIRE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
2
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities

The National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (NAICU) serves as the unified voice for the 1,700 private, nonprofit colleges and universities in our nation. (continued on Schedule O)

—
3
Disability Professionals Network

Assisting disabled students in their aspiration to enter into higher educastion.

Education
4
Association of American Universities Inc

Founded in 1900, aau is composed of 71 distinguished institutions in the united states and canada that continually advance society through education, research, and discovery. our u.s. member universities earn the majority of competitively…

Education
5
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
6
National Institute for Public Policy Inc

The institute works as a public education organization that focuses on a wide spectrum of rapidly evolving foreign policy and international issues.

—
7
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
American Academic Leadership Institute Inc

Services include, but are not limited to, identification and development of academic leadership talent and programs enabling them to be successful in their roles and to advance the institutions they serve; consultation to academic leaders…

Education
10
Association of University Anesthesiologists

The mission of the aua is to promote excellence in academic anesthesiology through mentorship; promotion of diversity and inclusivity; and professional growth throughout the careers of educators, academic leaders, and researchers.

Health
11
National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics

The national association of intercollegiate athletics (naia)'s mission is to promote the education and development of students through intercollegiate athletics participation.

—
12
Nonpareil Institute

Building Better Futures for Adults with Autism

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thanks Usa; the most unlike its peers is The Sylas Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOX ELDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $63,000 · OtherBOX ELDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTNaval Intelligence Professionals: $45,000 · OtherNaval Intelligence ProfessionalsLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES - CHAIRS FOR: $40,000 · OtherLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES - CHAIRS FORINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-MCKAY-DEE: $36,500 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-MCKAY-DEECHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY: $26,000 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAYPOLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · OtherASPIRE INC: $10,000 · OtherTHANKS USA: $10,000 · OtherPEOPLES FUND OF MAUI: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $32,500 · Other+9 moreOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $100,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCECCAI: $35,000 · Human ServicesCCAIThe Sylas Project: $6,000 · Human ServicesUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · AnimalsHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Education
Other$285,000Human Services$141,000Animals$8,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $100,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNaval Intelligence Professionals: $45,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCCAI: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASPIRE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFRIENDS FOR SIGHT: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Sylas Project: $6,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds Naval Intelligence Professionals ↗
  • Who funds CCAI ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THANKS USA ↗
  • Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR SIGHT ↗
  • Who funds The Sylas Project ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Edith Dee Charitable Trust C funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Edith Dee Charitable Trust C. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Green Edith Dee Charitable Trust C’s filings →

    More from the funding graph