Skip to content

· Private foundation

Greater Texas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
108
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$577k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$39MEmployment$6.5MPhilanthropy$3.5MSocial Science$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.2MHealth$826kYouth Development$717kPublic Safety & Disaster$618kOther$0
02FY2024 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $705k
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $4.9M
  • $250k+10 grants · $3.7M
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$302M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE$577,287
P16PLUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BEXAR COUNTY FOUNDATION INC$436,516
TEXAS 2036$400,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC$375,105
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$353,000
ECONOMIC MOBILITY SYSTEMS$334,756
TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION$325,000
MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS$325,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC$300,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$289,097
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC$221,850
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO$203,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY$196,288
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON-DOWNTOWN$188,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$183,459
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $328k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STUDENT VETERANS OF AMERICA: $43k → 14%A HOME BASE FOR TRANSITIONING FOSTER YOUTH: $10k → 22%BRIDGEYEAR: $100k → 16%BRIDGEYEAR: $79k → 16%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $46k → 10%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $40k → 10%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Greater Texas Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 92%.

Greater Texas Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49M · 100 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

100 repeat relationships: 57 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
18

Total granted

$49M
$400k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+18%

Still filing today

62%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    COMMIT2DALLAS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +96%
  • TC
    TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +79%
  • TH
    TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +60% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • PI
    PELOTONU INC
    one grant, 2022 · $152k · revenue +3%
  • WA
    WGU Advancement
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
2
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
3
Texas International Education Consortium

A consortium of universities in texas, with affiliate universities overseas, dedicated to developing, coordinating and implementing educational capacity-building programs around the world, and increasing capacity for campus globalization…

International
4
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
7
Austin Community College Foundation

Making education accessible for students through philanthropic support, aligned with Austin Community College (ACC) strategic priorities.

Education
8
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education; the most unlike its peers is Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/91
Grantees still filing
68/91
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $4,102,225 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $2,653,711 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON-DOWNTOWN: $1,355,365 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $1,207,556 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $1,203,988 · Other+65 more: $16,327,710 · Other+65 moreCOMMIT2DALLAS: $3,283,975 · EducationCOMMIT2DALLASTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $1,691,119 · EducationTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INIT…TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,540,000 · EducationTEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCOLLEGIATE EDU-NATION: $1,203,182 · EducationCOLLEGIATE EDU-NATIONTexas A&M Foundation: $1,121,217 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationCOMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $1,065,406 · EducationCOMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION NETWORK INCE3 ALLIANCE: $1,050,450 · EducationE3 ALLIANCETHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $701,896 · Education+43 more: $6,836,996 · Education+43 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $2,946,100 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITI…NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $565,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHEAST…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $294,527 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSIT…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY: $180,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $179,167 · Philanthropy+7 more: $406,780 · Philanthropy+7 moreTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,360,085 · Social ScienceINTERCULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $169,926 · Social ScienceJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $1,012,720 · EmploymentShannon Medical Center: $451,314 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $325,000 · HealthTexas 2036: $400,000 · Public BenefitWORKCRED INC: $306,552 · Public BenefitCombined Arms: $45,900 · Public Benefit
Other$26,850,555Education$18,494,241Philanthropy$4,571,574Social Science$1,530,011Employment$1,012,720Health$776,314Public Benefit$752,452

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS: $3,283,975 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $2,946,100 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $1,691,119 over 5y, 18% of budgetTEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,540,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,360,085 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGIATE EDU-NATION: $1,203,182 over 4y, 37% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $1,121,217 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $1,065,406 over 2y, 29% of budgetE3 ALLIANCE: $1,050,450 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $1,012,720 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $845,249 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $701,896 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetTHE GET SCHOOLED FOUNDATION: $650,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE: $597,754 over 3y, 14% of budgetNORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $565,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetP16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc: $537,516 over 3y, 11% of budgetECONOMIC MOBILITY CENTER ECONOMIC MOBILITY SYSTEMS: $502,135 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetSTRADA COLLABORATIVE INC: $482,467 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetShannon Medical Center: $451,314 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $450,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetNATL STUDENT CLEARINGHOUSE RESEARCH CENTER: $428,794 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetEMERGE Fellowship: $420,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $405,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $400,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTexas 2036: $400,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES: $385,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $325,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTexas A&M San Antonio Foundation: $321,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLEE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $307,620 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetWORKCRED INC: $306,552 over 3y, 12% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $300,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $294,527 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $247,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $245,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC: $240,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $239,677 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH HARRIS MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $195,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $190,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY: $180,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetINSTRUCTION PARTNERS: $180,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $180,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBRIDGEYEAR: $179,198 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $179,167 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $169,926 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPELOTONU INC: $151,765 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $149,503 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $148,044 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE EDU-NATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds E3 ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GET SCHOOLED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC MOBILITY CENTER ECONOMIC MOBILITY SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds STRADA COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Shannon Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NATL STUDENT CLEARINGHOUSE RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EMERGE Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas 2036 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trellis FoundationTX57.2× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trellis Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Gates Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Ecmc Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Texas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Texas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Greater Texas Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Greater Texas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greater Texas’ filings →

More from the funding graph