· Public charity
Greater Phoenix Leadership Inc
To improve the greater phoenix area and the state of arizona by bringing together talent, resources and leadership to create action on priority issues.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
- $250k+2 grants · $821k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMITTEE FOR AZ LEADERSHIP | $500,000 |
| RIO REIMAGINED FOUNDATION | $320,590 |
| VALLEY LEADERSHIP | $25,000 |
| STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $321k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR ECONOMIC INNOVATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +806%
- VLVALLEY LEADERSHIP CORPORATION6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +10%
STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- ISINVEST SOUTHWESTone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -13%
- SOSAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +549%
- GPGPL PACone grant, 2017 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To celebrate excellence and cultivate opportunity in pk-12th grade arizona public education.
We facilitate effective, bipartisan partnerships needed to achieve educational excellence and scale success across arizona's public schools - both district and charter.
Arizona is on the cusp of a technological rise. invisionaz will accelerate the growth of arizona's vibrant tech ecosystem by creating, promoting, and leading the framework that allows technology, innovation, and investment to flourish. the…
Arizona Forward brings business and civic leaders together to promote cooperative efforts to improve the environmental sustainability and economic vitality of our state and local regions.
To advocate for and act on education improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans.
Arizonans for economic prosperity mission is to work toward a prosperous arizona economy for all.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To connect and strengthen arizona's technology industry and community, promote state and federal policies that enhance arizona's technology industry, deliver quality content and events to educate those working in arizona's expanding…
The mission of the arizona chamber foundation is to be a leading resource of forward-thinking expert research, analysis, news and public programming on policy issues that impact arizona business and the state's business climate and to…
Preservation and strengthening of the regional economy through initiatives focused on industry recruitment, expansion and development. The mission is accomplished by providing consulting services, promotion of special events, and leasing…
Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.
The mission of startupaz is to build a local community of entrepreneurs that want to make a positive impact in arizona.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save Our Schools Arizona and the most unlike its peers is Expect More Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIO REIMAGINED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR ECONOMIC INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EXPECT MORE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INVEST SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Helios Education Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Phoenix Leadership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.