Skip to content

· Private foundation

Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun

Medical grants and scholarships Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$149kEducation$143kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kHealth$28kHuman Services$17kArts & Culture$15kFood & Nutrition$8kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CLARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW WASHINGTON MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CLARK CO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT S&R$4,998
NEW WASHINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$4,995
CHARLESTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$4,972
CHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL$4,943
CHARLESTOWN FAMILY ACTIVITIES PARK$4,800
CHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL$4,267
CLARK COUNTY 4H$2,935
NEW WASHINGTON MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL$2,768
CLARK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$2,500
PLEASANT RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,232
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 15 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
71

Total granted

$164k
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+33%

Still filing today

13%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2025 · $26k
  • NW
    NEW WASHINGTON MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k
  • CL
    CHARLESTOWN LITTLE LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • SC
    SILVER CREEK ATHLETIC DEPT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • NH
    NWMHS HEALTH SERVICES ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CY
    CHARLESTOWN YOUTH FOOTBALL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ellenville Nursery School

Early childhood education / nursery school

Education
2
Indiana Delta of Pi Beta Phi Inc

To provide college student housing

—
3
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
4
Childs Elementary Pto

Elementary school pto to financially assist the school and the students

Education
5
Jelv Pto

The PTO was formed to support the students, staff and teachers of the Jessamine Early Learning Village

Education
6
Indian Lake Elementary School Pto

To raise funds for indian lake elementary school.

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
9
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
10
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
11
Independence Community Pto

The independence community pto supports junior kindergarten through 6th grade students, teachers/faculty, and families in the independence community school district.

Philanthropy
12
Tyrone Area Elementary School Pto

Pto parents teachers associatio

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ivy Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Opening Gates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL: $26,223 · OtherCHARLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOLNEW WASHINGTON MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL: $22,822 · OtherNEW WASHINGTON MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL+87 more: $332,791 · Other+87 moreIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationSilver Creek Elementary Parent Teacher Organization: $4,918 · EducationJONATHAN JENNINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $4,800 · EducationGEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationDePauw University: $2,500 · EducationBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $2,500 · EducationNEW WASHINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $4,995 · Public Safety & DisasterCHARLESTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,972 · Public Safety & DisasterMEDELLA HOUSE INC: $4,383 · HealthPURE EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $2,701 · Healththe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPENING GATES INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$381,836Education$22,218Public Safety & Disaster$9,967Health$7,084Human Services$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLESTOWN LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $11,575 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPURE EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $2,701 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLESTOWN LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPENING GATES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW WASHINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Silver Creek Elementary Parent Teacher Organization ↗
  • Who funds JONATHAN JENNINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun?

    Find your warmest path to Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater North Clark Healthcare Foun’s filings →

    More from the funding graph