Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Monroe County United Way Inc

Raise funds for variety of health and social organizations and distribute these funds accordingly.

$213k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Food & Nutrition$141kPhilanthropy$36kHealth$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$26,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MS$36,000
FAITH FOOD PANTRY$26,250
LOAVES AND FIRSHES FOOD PANTRY$26,250
AMORY MEALS ON WHEELS$26,250
AMORY FOOD PANTRY$26,250
FIRST FRIENDS$26,250
SALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES$15,250
REGIONAL REHAB CENTER$15,250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMORY FOOD PANTRY: $26k → 15%AMORY FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$174k · 5 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$174k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+73%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMORY FOOD PANTRY INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $36k · revenue +4%
  • AM
    AMORY MEALS ON WHEELS
    2× · 2018–2020 · $36k
  • FF
    FAITH FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue -19%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MS
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
  • SK
    SALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -7%
  • RR
    REGIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMORY MEALS ON WHEELS: $36,025 · OtherAMORY MEALS ON WHEELSUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MS: $36,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MSFIRST FRIENDS: $33,125 · OtherFIRST FRIENDSSALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,250 · OtherSALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INCREGIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $15,250 · OtherREGIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $15,250 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSAMORY FOOD PANTRY INC: $36,325 · Human ServicesAMORY FOOD PANTR…FAITH FOOD PANTRY: $34,525 · Food & NutritionFAITH FOOD PANT…ABERDEEN LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $33,925 · Civil RightsABERDEEN LOAVES…
Other$150,900Human Services$36,325Food & Nutrition$34,525Civil Rights$33,925

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMORY FOOD PANTRY INC: $36,325 over 2y, 13% of budgetFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $34,525 over 2y, 14% of budgetABERDEEN LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD PANTRY: $33,925 over 2y, 29% of budgetSALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetREGIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $15,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Northeast Mississippi IncMS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Northeast Mississippi Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Monroe County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Monroe County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Monroe County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph