Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation

The primary focus of the board has been to help support programs thatsupport the global health in the community in greater lee's summit.grants and scholarships are awarded annually.

$145k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Greater Kansas City Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $57k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
7
’18
0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$882kHealth$53kHuman Services$19kYouth Development$16kHousing & Shelter$10kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$8k
02FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $57,210, the rows itemized in this filing. The $145,210 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $88,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN KNOX VILLAGE$11,710
NEW SPRINGS COMMUNITY$10,000
TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$8,000
LEE'S SUMMIT CARES$8,000
ONE GOOD MEAL$7,500
REDISCOVER$6,000
PRO DEO$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE HOUSE INC: $8k → 15%JOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 4 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$69k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+56%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +46%
  • R
    Rediscover
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +111%
  • PD
    PRO DEO YOUTH CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • HT
    HILLCREST TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
4
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
5
Swope Health Services

Swope health services (swope health) improves the health and wellness of the community by delivering accessible, quality, comprehensive patient care.

Health
6
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
7
Tri-County Mental Health Services Inc

To provide prevention and recovery-oriented mental health and substance use services which are quality assured and person centered, with increased attention to the whole person.

Health
8
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
9
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
10
Hope Family Care Center Llc

Hope family care center's mission is to honor god by establishing and operating a health clinic that provides compassionate, high-quality, whole-person care to individuals and families in east kansas city who have had the hardest time…

Health
11
Provident Inc

Building brighter futures through exceptional behavioral health services, especially for those with the greatest need.

Health
12
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rediscover; the most unlike its peers is One Good Meal Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Greater Kansas City Community Foundation: $1,036,654 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Community FoundationRediscover: $18,000 · OtherNEW SPRINGS COMMUNITY: $10,000 · OtherHILLCREST TRANSITIONAL HOUSING: $10,000 · OtherTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $19,795 · HealthLEE'S SUMMIT CARES: $15,500 · HealthJOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $11,710 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesPRO DEO YOUTH CENTER: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentONE GOOD MEAL INC: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$1,036,654Other$38,000Health$35,295Human Services$19,210Youth Development$16,000Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $1,036,654 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $19,795 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRediscover: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO DEO YOUTH CENTER: $16,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetLEE'S SUMMIT CARES: $15,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetJOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $11,710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE GOOD MEAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Truman Heartland Community Foundation · Government Employees Health Association Inc · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Health Forward Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph