Skip to content
Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc

The Foundation changes and enrich lives through education, guidance and financial support to area nonprofits.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$201kReligion$137kHuman Services$103kFood & Nutrition$60kCommunity Improvement$52kArts & Culture$26kEnvironment$10kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $53,944, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,951 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $139,007 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Food Bank Inc$15,500
Green Valley Gardners$12,444
SUSD #30$7,000
Sahuarita Educ Enrich Fnd$7,000
Continental SD Ed Foundation$6,000
La Posada Community Services$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $202k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ARIVACA HELPING HEARTS: $6k → 15%Arivaca Coordinating Council: $6k → 15%PPEP - AMADO YOUTH CENTER: $6k → 15%ARIVACA COORDINATION COUNCIL: $6k → 15%SAHUARITA EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $83k → 15%SAHUARITA EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $64k → 15%Sahuarita Educ Enrich Fnd: $24k → 15%Sahuarita Educ Enrich Fnd: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$334k · 5 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$334k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SAHUARITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $178k · revenue +34% · 54% of their budget
  • CS
    Continental School District Educational Foundation
    2× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +72%
  • AH
    Arivaca Human Resources
    2× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • BS
    BETH SHALOM TEMPLE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $137k
  • BC
    Border Community Alliance Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $46k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SANTA CRUZ VALLEY ART ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Urban Agriculture Foundation
Food & Nutrition
3
Arizona Site Steward Program Foundation
Education
4
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
5
Arizona Sustainability Alliance

To create and support cutting-edge, project-based sustainability solutions in arizona.

Environment
6
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
7
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
8
Azland Fund

To collectively mobilize community, assets, shared experiences, and ancestral knowledge to empower historically underserved peoples.

Environment
9
Sedona Area Homeless Alliance

Sedona Area Homeless Alliance is the primary source of services, information and personal support for the homeless community in the Sedona Arizona area and was established to fill the void of services.

Human Services
10
Arizona Railroad Historical Society
Arts & Culture
11
The Bisbee Foundation Inc

Our focus is to work with groups and individuals who are in the arts, humanities, education and historic preservation with goals designed to enhance Bisbees unique place in the history of the Southwest, the contribution made to Bisbees…

—
12
Pta Arizona Congress of Parents & Teachers Inc

Our Parent Teacher Association is committed to helping our children learn and thrive by creating a partnership between families, teachers and administrators.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Cruz Valley Art Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Continental School District Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAHUARITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $178,126 · Human ServicesSAHUARITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUC…Arivaca Human Resources: $11,500 · Human ServicesArivaca Human Resources+2 more: $12,000 · Human Services+2 moreBETH SHALOM TEMPLE CENTER: $137,000 · OtherBETH SHALOM TEMPLE CENTERGREEN VALLEY GARDENERS: $12,444 · OtherGREEN VALLEY GARDENERSFRIENDS OF MADERA CANYON: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MADERA CANYONSUSD #30: $7,000 · OtherGreen Valley Assistance Services Inc: $97,300 · HealthGreen Valley Assis…Border Community Alliance Inc: $46,099 · Community ImprovementCommunity Food Bank Inc: $31,500 · Food & NutritionSAHUARITA FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSANTA CRUZ VALLEY ART ASSOCIATION INC: $25,745 · Arts & CultureContinental School District Educational Foundation: $16,000 · EducationLA POSADA COMMUNITIES: $6,000 · Religion
Human Services$201,626Other$166,444Health$97,300Community Improvement$46,099Food & Nutrition$41,500Arts & Culture$25,745Education$16,000Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAHUARITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $178,126 over 4y, 54% of budgetGreen Valley Assistance Services Inc: $97,300 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetBorder Community Alliance Inc: $46,099 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $31,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CRUZ VALLEY ART ASSOCIATION INC: $25,745 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetContinental School District Educational Foundation: $16,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetArivaca Human Resources: $11,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF MADERA CANYON: $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetPORTABLE PRACTICAL EDUCATIONAL PREPARATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArivaca Helping Hearts: $6,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Burton Family Foundat…Trico FoundationUnited Way of Tucson …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Burton Family Foundation · Trico Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Greater Green Valley Community FDN Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Green Valley Community FDN’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home