Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Greater Fargo Moorhead Economic Development Corporation

The GREATER FARGO MOORHEAD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (gfmedc) is a catalyst for economic growth and prosperity.

$15k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Community Improvement$263kEmployment$62kEducation$26kArts & Culture$24kPhilanthropy$15kScience & Tech$15k
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CASS-CLAY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CONCORDIA COLLEGE: $14k → 11%MN DEPT OF EMPLOY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 14%TS STARTUPS LLC: $3k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $15k → 10%EMERGING PRAIRIE: $98k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $10k → 13%MSTATE: $15k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%EMERGING PRAIRIE: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $10k → 13%MSTATE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI: $10k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%NDSU RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK INC: $10k → 12%EMERGING PRAIRIE: $8k → 12%NDSU RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK INC: $5k → 12%FM AREA FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%FOLKWAYS: $12k → 12%FOLKWAYS: $12k → 12%UNITED WAY OF CASS-CLAY: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$257k · 7 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$257k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+126%

Still filing today

71%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Community ImprovementScience & TechEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EMERGING PRAIRIE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $116k · revenue +63%
  • UW
    United Way of Cass-Clay
    3× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • MS
    M STATE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +126%
  • N
    NDSCS
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • CC
    CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
2
Und Center for Innovation Foundation

To maintain national leadership in entrepreneur outreach and education, and become the leader in tech entrepreneurship in rural America.

Community Improvement
3
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
4
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Und Alumni Association and Foundation

Engage alumni, friends, and partners in building an extraordinary University of North Dakota.

Education
7
Northern State University Foundation

The Northern State University Foundation is dedicated to securing the future of Northern State University. Its purpose is to solicit and administer funds and to pursue other activities to advance this goal.

8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

9
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

10
Bismarck State College Foundation

Engage in those activities which support and assist in the development and advancement of Bismarck State College.

Education
11
Valley City State University Foundation

Valley City State University Foundation aids in the advancement of Valley City State University by awarding scholarships and by promoting the University. Support comes primarily from contributions by individuals and businesses, fundraising…

12
Greater Fargo Moorhead Economic Development Corporation

The greater fargo moorhead economic development corporation (gfmedc) is a catalyst for economic growth and prosperity. using a comprehensive approach to economic development, the gfmedc accelerates job and wealth creation in cass county,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Ndscs Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMERGING PRAIRIE — $115,500 · Community ImprovementEMERGING PRAIRIETHE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGO — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGOUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $45,000 · OtherUnited Way of Cass-ClayM STATE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI — $25,000 · OtherM STATE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNIFOLKWAYS — $24,000 · OtherFOLKWAYSUniversity of North Dakota-College of Business & Public Admin — $20,000 · OtherUniversity of North Dakota-College of Bus…NDSCS — $15,000 · OtherNDSCSCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION — $13,500 · OtherCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION+2 more — $4,601 · OtherFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyNDSU Research & Technology Park — $15,000 · Science & TechNDSCS FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Education
Community Improvement$215,500Other$147,101Philanthropy$15,000Science & Tech$15,000Education$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERGING PRAIRIE — $115,500 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetTHE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGO — $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNDSU Research & Technology Park — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNDSCS FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Central InitiativeMN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Central Initiative · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Fargo Moorhead Economic Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph