Skip to content
Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association

To provide various services to our member hospitals and health care organizations.

$8.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$58MCrime & Legal$488kHuman Services$413kEducation$25kEmployment$11kYouth Development$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,336,764
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL$7,336,764
KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER$1,531,869
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NOAH'S WORLD: $7k → 14%STRYKER MEDICAL: $51k → 12%LEARN TO EARN: $25k → 9%CARE COORDINATION SYSTEMS: $11k → 13%LIFE ESSENTIALS: $150k → 14%CENTRAL OHIO POISON CENTER NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $201k → 15%LIFE ESSENTIALS: $150k → 14%CENTRAL OHIO POISON CENTER NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $201k → 15%LIFE ESSENTIALS: $150k → 14%CENTRAL OHIO POISON CENTER NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $201k → 15%LIFE ESSENTIALS: $38k → 14%CENTRAL OHIO POISON CENTER NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $196k → 15%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $2.5M → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $1.5M → 14%GRANDVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $1.0M → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $970k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $778k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $593k → 14%SYCAMORE MEDICAL CENTER: $487k → 14%SYCAMORE MEDICAL CENTER: $366k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $363k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $276k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $258k → 14%KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $41k → 14%DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $147k → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $8.4M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $7.3M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $6.6M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $6.2M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $5.8M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $5.2M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $4.2M → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $3.0M → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $352k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $163k → 14%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF MIAMI VALLEY: $150k → 14%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF MIAMI VALLEY: $150k → 14%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF MIAMI VALLEY: $113k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57M · 6 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$57M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+86%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $47M · revenue +96%
  • KM
    KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.2M · revenue +39%
  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $413k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • DO
    DAYTON OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +86%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES LEVY CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2021 · $175k
  • DC
    DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $147k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fidelity Health Care

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
2
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
3
Seton Health System Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. founded in community-based legacies of compassionate healing, we…

—
4
Kettering Adventist Healthcare

Our mission is to live god's love by promoting and restoring health.

—
5
Adena Health System

The adena health system's mission is "called to serve our communities the vision is "to be our region's most trusted partner for healthcare."

Health
6
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
7
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

Health
8
Greene Memorial Hospital

Our mission is to live god's love by promoting and restoring health.

Health
9
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
10
St Mary's Sacred Heart Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's sacred heart hospital is a member of trinity health georgia…

Health
11
Samaritan Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. samaritan hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kettering Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Life Essentials Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $46,695,809 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITALKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $8,151,225 · HealthKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER+2 more: $1,184,668 · HealthNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $798,260 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $514,668 · OtherLIFE ESSENTIALS INC: $487,500 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY: $412,523 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES LEVY CAMPAIGN: $175,000 · Other+3 more: $69,287 · OtherLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $25,000 · Education
Health$56,031,702Other$2,457,238Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $46,695,809 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $8,151,225 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDAYTON OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL: $1,037,713 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $514,668 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE ESSENTIALS INC: $487,500 over 4y, 28% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY: $412,523 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $146,955 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ESSENTIALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Dayton Area H…The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Fidelity Investments …
Greater Dayton Area Health InformationOH13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Dayton Area Health Information · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home