Skip to content
Greater Dayton Area Health Information Network at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Dayton Area Health Information Network

To promote a healthier community by improving access to clinical, financial and administrative information to facilitate delivery of healthcare services in a timely and cost-effective manner; to provide support services for disaster medical planning.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.0MPublic Benefit$556kArts & Culture$160kEmployment$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$11k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $557,181, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,026,591 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $469,410 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $430k
$18,846
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC)$138,383
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH$123,759
CITY OF DAYTON$95,000
COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO$73,128
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL$28,341
PREPARADNESS SOLUTIONSBURDISS$25,000
COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS$18,846
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAID$11,500
WILSON HEALTH$9,500
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$9,500
UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER$9,353
WAYNE HEALTHCARE$9,271
WRIGHT STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC): $138k → 14%MOBILE MEDICAL REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE: $37k → 12%PREPARADNESS SOLUTIONSBURDISS: $25k → 9%GREG LOCKER: $18k → 12%CARE COORDINATION SYSTEMS: $55k → 13%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $23k → 15%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $124k → 15%VYAIRE: $24k → 8%CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC): $21k → 14%WILSON HEALTH: $19k → 9%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $22k → 15%COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $73k → 15%PREPARADNESS SOLUTIONSBURDISS: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $19k → 15%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAID: $18k → 15%WILSON HEALTH: $12k → 9%TIMOTHY J KERNAN: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $19k → 15%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $18k → 15%SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY: $18k → 15%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $350k → 14%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $18k → 15%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $45k → 14%COMMUNITY MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS: $14k → 15%MARY PORTER: $81k → 9%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $29k → 14%MARY PORTER: $74k → 9%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $28k → 14%DIXIE KIRKLAND: $33k → 9%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $27k → 14%MARY PORTER: $30k → 9%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $27k → 14%DIXIE KIRKLAND: $20k → 9%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $26k → 14%MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $24k → 14%DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $13k → 14%STEVE JEZ: $66k → 9%DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12k → 14%GRAINGER: $16k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $95k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $70k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $66k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $65k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $65k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $65k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $65k → 14%CITY OF DAYTON: $65k → 14%CARESOURCE: $16k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$389k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$2.4M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-31%

Still filing today

44%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthScience & TechArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $557k · revenue +96%
  • CM
    Community Mercy Health Partners
    8× · 2017–2024 · $134k · revenue +24%
  • DC
    DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARE COORDINATION SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2020 · $55k
  • V
    VYAIRE
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
  • SR
    SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
2
Fidelity Health Care

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
3
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
4
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
5
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
6
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
7
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
9
Caromont Health

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Bay Park Community Hospital

Bay park community hospital is dedicated to premier service, committed to superior quality, and devoted to our patients and families. our values include: collaboration - working together as a team, internally with employees, physicians,…

Health
12
Hospital Council of Northwest Ohio

The hospital council of northwest ohio is a member-driven organization that represents and advocates on behalf of its member hospitals and health systems, and provides collaborative opportunities to enhance the health status of the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Valley Hospital; the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF DAYTON: $555,768 · OtherCITY OF DAYTONMARY PORTER: $185,156 · OtherMARY PORTEROHIO DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $123,759 · OtherOHIO DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUTHMONTGOMERY COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $120,000 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTYMOBILE MEDICAL REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE LLC: $92,055 · OtherMOBILE MEDICAL REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE LLCSTEVE JEZ: $71,000 · OtherDIXIE KIRKLAND: $68,498 · OtherCARE COORDINATION SYSTEMS: $55,000 · Other+13 more: $236,454 · Other+13 moreMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $556,630 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITALCommunity Mercy Health Partners: $133,814 · HealthCommunity Mercy Health PartnersDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $84,401 · HealthDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALTHE SHELBY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $77,430 · HealthTHE SHELBY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSO…UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $71,640 · HealthUPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERWayne Hospital Company: $64,898 · HealthWayne Hospital Company+1 more: $15,823 · HealthNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $159,528 · Arts & CultureCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $73,128 · EmploymentPARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORPORATION: $44,800 · Science & Tech
Other$1,507,690Health$1,004,636Arts & Culture$159,528Employment$73,128Science & Tech$44,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $556,630 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $159,528 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Mercy Health Partners: $133,814 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $84,401 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHELBY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $77,430 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $73,128 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $71,640 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWayne Hospital Company: $64,898 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORPORATION: $44,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY: $18,107 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCareSource: $15,823 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $11,702 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Mercy Health Partners ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELBY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Wayne Hospital Company ↗
  • Who funds PARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY ↗
  • Who funds CareSource ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Dayton Area H…The Research & Educat…Fidelity Investments …
Greater Dayton Area Hospital AssociationOH13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association · The Research & Educational Foundation of the Ohio Hospital Association · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Dayton Area Health Information Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Dayton Area Health Information Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Dayton Area Health Information Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home