How much did GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

givingeverybentonchemical dependencysubstance abuseprevention treatment

2020

walla wallamembersfreeeverylivesidealrecovery

2021

givinghigher educationwalla wallaaddressfutureyakima valleytreatment

2022

firehigher educationwalla wallaeverychemical dependencysubstance abuserecovery

2023

lifelongnorthwestfoodfire districtproviderstogetherdevelop

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k6 grants · $165k
$50k–250k23 grants · $2.5M
$250k+3 grants · $978k

$90,000

Median grant

States reached

$71M

Total assets

Largest grants

KITTITAS COUNTY HEALTH NETWORK$359,868
SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH$342,146
BENTON FRANKLIN HEALTH DISTRICT$276,021
COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON$214,637
YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES$178,240
KITTITAS COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6$174,943
BLUE MOUNTAIN HEART TO HEART$135,841
TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER$130,874
GARFIELD COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1$127,216
UPPER KITTITAS MEDIC ONE (KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL #2)$111,752
COLUMBIA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1$110,000
KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$110,000
BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTIONS DISTRICT #4$100,000
CITY OF CLARKSTON$100,000
WALLA WALLA FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$47M · 67 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

67 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$47M

$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+43%

Still filing today

57%

68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YV
YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC
4× · 2019–2022 · $2.1M · revenue +73%
PM
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GROUP
5× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +64%
YN
YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES
6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +83%

Funded once

YV
YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $622k · revenue +209%
SH
SECOND HARVESTgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +38%
WW
WALLA WALLA FIRE DEPARTMENT
one grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Columbia County Community Healthcare

Improving access to healthcare and supporting the health/well-being of people in our rural community.

Health

Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Volunteer Health Care Services

Health

Umpqua Community Health Center

Provide quality, compassionate, accessible & affordable healthcare to the people of douglas county.

Health

Northwest Community Health Care

The organization is a federally qualified health center that provides primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related patient support services to more than 18,000 individuals regardless of ability to pay.

Health

La Pine Community Health Center

La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.

Health

Columbia Valley Community Health

Partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health

Partnership Health Center Inc

Medical, dental, and mental health services for low income, uninsured, and underinsured patients in the missoula, montana region.

—

North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health

Highline Medical Center Foundation

Highline Medical Center Foundation engages our community so that everyone has access to exceptional health care close to home.

Health

Columbia River Health

Empowering members of our community to improve their quality of life, one patient at a time.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kadlec Regional Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/102

the rest of the field

477/5,220

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

64 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

62/64

Grantees still filing

52/64

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$22,969,473Other$21,301,292Philanthropy$3,135,755Human Services$1,911,482Education$506,800Food & Nutrition$300,000Community Improvement$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA41× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Blue Mountain Community Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Providence Health & Services - · Northwest Harvest Emm · Seattle Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · United Way of Central Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Better Health Together · Perigee Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911357957 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TRI-STATE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 85% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Greater Columbia Accountable Community?

Find your warmest path to Greater Columbia Accountable Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

64 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Columbia Accountable Community?

More from the funding graph

GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

64 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Columbia Accountable Community?

More from the funding graph