Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Grand Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Education$415kHuman Services$105kRecreation & Sports$59kHealth$54kPhilanthropy$53kReligion$52kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$1,030
Median grant
9
States reached
$263k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAUKEGAN TO COLLEGE$52,000
CARMEL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
DOTTED LINE DIVAS$10,371
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$10,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$10,000
THE CIVIC THEATER OF GREATER LAYFAYETTE$10,000
MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION$5,833
SIENA RETREAT CENTER$5,170
ZACH JOHNSON FOUNDATION$5,166
YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS$5,000
MADISON PARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
ROOTED ANTIOCH$5,000
AWESOME YOUNG AUTHOR'S AWARD AND COMMUNITY$5,000
RISE WISCONSIN INC$3,000
NORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%UNLIMITED PLAY: $7k → 5%VETERANS OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $1k → 10%SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%SHARING CENTER: $500 → 10%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $1k → 10%WALKIN IN MY SHOES: $5k → 10%KENOSHA CHRISTMAS CHARITIES: $550 → 10%KEEPING FAMILIES COVERED: $4k → 8%TWICE AS NICE MOTHER AND CHILD: $4k → 8%HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JCC: $1k → 17%KEEPING FAMILIES COVERED: $3k → 8%LUTHERN COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%KEEPING FAMILIES COVERED: $500 → 8%TWICE AS NICE MOTHER AND CHILD: $250 → 8%TWICE AS NICE MOTHER AND CHILD: $247 → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $750 → 14%PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%UCAN: $309 → 14%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $3k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%MOTHERS TRUST FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $3k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $1k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
IA
IN
OH
CT
MO
KS
SC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$629k · 50 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
140

Total granted

$629k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+29%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2020–2022 · $140k · revenue +52%
  • WT
    Waukegan To College NFP
    6× · 2018–2024 · $107k · revenue +162%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $37k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY SPONSORS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • SP
    Saturday Place
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +15%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
3
Kishwaukee United Way

To improve lives by sharing community resources

Philanthropy
4
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
5
Variety - the Children's Charity of Wisconsin Inc

Enriching the lives of children with physical or developmental special needs and their families.

—
6
Lad Lake Inc

The mission of lad lake, inc. is to guide the growth of at-risk youth so that they reach their potential and live responsibly.

—
7
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
8
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
9
Goodwill Manufacturing Inc

Goodwill manufacturing, inc. ("goodwill manufacturing") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit…

Employment
10
Wisconsin Family Ties Inc

Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…

—
11
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
12
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community EndowmentsSocial Justice AdvocacyVeterans Service Organizati…Labor Union LocalsSchool Support OrganizationsYouth Sports LeaguesFamily Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr14%9%5–10yr18%27%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr18%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%28%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr18%37%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/119
the rest of the field
14%
7,883/56,300

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/103
Grantees still filing
75/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARMEL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $65,050 · OtherCARMEL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ACADEMY — $53,250 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ACADEMYWAUKEGAN PARK DISTRICT — $21,298 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $15,500 · Other+139 more — $280,746 · Other+139 moreUniversity of Chicago — $140,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoWaukegan To College NFP — $107,000 · EducationWaukegan To College NFP+10 more — $19,286 · Education+10 moreCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $36,750 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO…Mothers Trust Foundation — $12,921 · Human ServicesMothers Tr…KEEPING FAMILIES COVERED — $10,997 · Human ServicesKEEPING FA…UNLIMITED PLAY INC — $6,643 · Human ServicesUNLIMITED …Equestrian Connection NFP — $4,500 · Human ServicesWALKIN IN MY SHOES INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesThe Roberti Community House — $3,000 · Human ServicesPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest — $3,000 · Human Services+9 more — $6,468 · Human Services+9 moreSaturday Place — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHICAGO SURVIVORS INC — $7,226 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF THE CITY — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMADISON READING PROJECT INC — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentREADING POWER INC — $2,071 · Youth Development+1 more — $1,350 · Youth DevelopmentZACH JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $15,166 · PhilanthropySHEPHERDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGIVING TO THE NATIONS INC — $7,050 · PhilanthropyTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $1,750 · PhilanthropyLAKE COUNTY SPONSORS — $20,400 · ReligionIndy Hygiene Hub Inc — $10,371 · Religion+2 more — $1,500 · ReligionCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC — $14,228 · HealthTHIS TIME TOMORROW INC — $3,500 · HealthRISE WISCONSIN INC — $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthBRIDGE THE GAP INC — $1,000 · HealthANDY NIEBLER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Health+4 more — $2,485 · Health
Other$435,844Education$266,286Human Services$88,779Youth Development$43,647Philanthropy$41,966Religion$32,271Health$27,213

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago — $140,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWaukegan To College NFP — $107,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $36,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY SPONSORS — $20,400 over 1y, 12% of budgetSaturday Place — $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetZACH JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $15,166 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC — $14,228 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation — $12,921 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKEEPING FAMILIES COVERED — $10,997 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetIndy Hygiene Hub Inc — $10,371 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS — $10,154 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHEPHERDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCIVIC THEATRE OF GREATER LAFAYETTE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $8,126 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAPERVILLE RESPONDS FOR OUR VETERANS — $8,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHICAGO SURVIVORS INC — $7,226 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGIVING TO THE NATIONS INC — $7,050 over 5y, 10% of budgetUNLIMITED PLAY INC — $6,643 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE COUNTY HONOR FLIGHT — $6,511 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSIENA RETREAT CENTER INC — $5,170 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEART OF THE CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWALKIN IN MY SHOES INC — $4,500 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Better Life For Kids — $3,564 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHIS TIME TOMORROW INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORDS ON WHEELS — $3,250 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetThe Roberti Community House — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMADISON READING PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRISE WISCONSIN INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOneHope27 Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVera French Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMT MERU COFFEE PROJECT INC — $2,924 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHelping Hands Healing Hooves Inc — $2,780 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEMPOWERED TUTORING INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC — $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC — $2,071 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE N KIND — $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…AbbVie FoundationThe Lake County Commu…Trustmark FoundationJohn and Kathleen Sch…Baxter International …Kunes Family Foundati…Julian Grace Foundati…First Bank Chicago Fo…Northwestern Memorial…Give N KindGreater Milwaukee Fou…
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI32.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Lake County Community Foundation · Trustmark Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Baxter International Foundation · Kunes Family Foundation · Julian Grace Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Give N Kind · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grand Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 216 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines