Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace H Noyes Bo 7 Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$277kYouth Development$243kHealth$107kReligion$79kHousing & Shelter$45k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$14,225
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - SPRINGFIEL$14,225
CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT$14,225
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$14,225
SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$14,225
GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL & WESTERN MA$14,225
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC$14,225
HELIX HAMAN SERVICES$14,225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $15k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $14k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 17%CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 17%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $10k → 17%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $10k → 17%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $9k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $15k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $14k → 17%HELIX HAMAN SERVICES: $14k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $13k → 17%HELIX HAMAN SERVICES: $13k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $13k → 17%CHILDRENS' STUDY HOME INC: $13k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $13k → 17%CHILDRENS' STUDY HOME INC: $12k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CTR INC: $10k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CTR INC: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS' STUDY HOME INC: $10k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $10k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CTR INC: $9k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$750k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$750k
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +153%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +90%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +118%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Children's Hospital Corporation

    Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

    Health
    2
    Boys & Girls Club of Marshfield Inc

    The organization's mission is to enable and inspire all young people to realize their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens as well as become tomorrows capable leaders, while supporting local families and community.

    Youth Development
    3
    Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts Inc

    Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.

    Youth Development
    4
    Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

    Pediatric healthcare, education & research

    —
    5
    Children's Specialty Group Inc

    The mission of children's specialty group, inc. ("csg") is to provide the highest quality specialty health care services to infants, children and adolescents and to advance the effectiveness of health care through education and the…

    Health
    6
    Shriners Hospital for Children
    Philanthropy
    7
    United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

    Children's services

    Human Services
    8
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

    To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    9
    Concord Children's Center Inc

    To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

    Human Services
    10
    Children's Medical Center Corporation

    To operate exclusively for the benefit of The Children's Hospital Corporation and its affiliated organizations in the conduct of their charitable, educational and scientific functions.

    Health
    11
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Illinois

    To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    12
    Spring Hill Center Dba Spring Hill Children's Center

    Spring hill children's center offers year-round nature-based, waldorf-inspired early childhood care programs for ages 3-6 in new hampshire's monadnock region. at spring hill children are given the space and time to truly live into their…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helix Human Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Young Women's Christian Association of L. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $107,177 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $107,177 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INCHELIX HUMAN SERVICES INC: $62,291 · Human ServicesHELIX HUMAN SERVICES INCYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF L: $28,568 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $78,610 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN MAS…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - SPRINGFIEL: $78,609 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN - SPRINGFI…GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL & WESTERN: $28,568 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL & WESTERNSPRINGFIELD HOME FOR FRIENDLE: $28,568 · OtherSPRINGFIELD HOME FOR FRIENDLESHRINERS' HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $22,983 · OtherSHRINERS' HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENSPRINGFIELD HOME FRIENDLESS: $16,319 · OtherSPRINGFIELD HOME FRIENDLESSSPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $107,178 · Youth DevelopmentSPRINGFIELD BOYS…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $65,364 · HealthTHE SHRINERS…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,831 · HealthSHRINERS HOS…
    Human Services$305,213Other$253,657Youth Development$107,178Health$84,195

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $107,178 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $107,177 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $107,177 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $78,610 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $65,364 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELIX HUMAN SERVICES INC: $62,291 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF L: $28,568 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,831 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SPRINGFIELD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
    • Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds HELIX HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF L ↗
    • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Peoplesbank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Grace H Noyes Bo 7 Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace H Noyes Bo 7 Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
    • Helix Human Services Inc: 56% of income from government
    • Young Women's Christian Association of L: 53% of income from government
    • Center for Human Development Inc: 26% of income from government
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
    • Boys & Girls Club Family Center Inc: 3% of income from government
    • Springfield Boys & Girls Club Inc: 1% of income from government
    • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace H Noyes Bo 7 Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph