Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gougeon Employees Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
70
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Gougeon Employees Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Bay Area Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 35 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Gougeon Employees Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 34 organizations, $120k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

25
’20
31
’21
30
’22
30
’23
34
’24
35
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$76kYouth Development$63kEducation$59kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$38kArts & Culture$34kHousing & Shelter$26kEnvironment$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k68 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY$13,000
BAY VETERANS FOUNDATION$10,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-FOOD PANT$7,000
DELTA COLLEGE$5,150
BRIANS HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION$5,000
SAGINAW VALLEY NAVAL SHIP MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
BAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA$3,000
HIDDEN HARVEST$2,500
SVSU FOUNDATION-SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWME$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY$2,100
GREAT LAKES BAY HEALTH CENTERS$2,000
MID MICHIGAN CHILDRENS MUSEUM$2,000
UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 7%PRISM PROJECT: $500 → 16%ADOPTION OPTION: $25k → 9%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $1k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $1k → 18%HIDDEN HARVEST: $3k → 18%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $1k → 14%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $500 → 14%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $500 → 14%FOSTER FAMILIES NAVIGATION RESOUR: $250 → 14%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $250 → 14%RIVER JORDAN INC: $8k → 14%RIVER JORDAN INC: $6k → 14%RIVER JORDAN INC: $5k → 14%FOSTER FAMILIES NAVIGATION RESOUR: $1k → 14%FOSTER FAMILIES NAVIGATION RESOUR: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
WI
MI
MA
OH
RI
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 74 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
52

Total granted

$495k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+49%

Still filing today

43%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +121%
  • RM
    Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +25%
  • DC
    DELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION YOUTH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Future Inc

Dedicated to facilitating economic development strategies that promote and secure opportunities for business retention, growth, and the attraction of new industries that create quality jobs for community residents.

Community Improvement
2
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
3
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
4
Northern Bay Ambulance and Rescue Service

To make advanced life support service available to approximately 10,500 residents of five michigan townships and one city.

—
5
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
6
South Bay Artist Collective

The south bay artist collective's mission as a 501(c)3 non-profit is to support and grow the local visual arts community through creating a destination for art and creativity, while teaching and inspiring youth. our purpose is to support…

Arts & Culture
7
Bay Area Rehabilitation Center

Outpatient rehabilitation

—
8
Great Lakes Bay Region Quality of Life Council

Identifying, promoting, and creating awareness for projects to improve the quality of life for citizens of the great lakes bay area.

Environment
9
Bay Area Recycling for Charities

To inspire an environmentally conscious culture in Northern Michigan and beyond by educating people on the long-term value of recycling and making recycling and green choices simple and accessible to individuals and organizations across…

Environment
10
League of Michigan Bicyclists Inc

To promote bicycling and the rights of bicyclists on the roadways in michigan.

—
11
Bay Shore Services Inc

Our goal is to encourage full-citizenship and personal growth for all people, especially those with disabilities who live in the nine county area that comprises the eastern shore of maryland.

—
12
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foster Families Navigation & Resource Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Midland Figure Skating Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
35/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY: $76,700 · OtherUNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTYST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-FOOD PANT: $27,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY-FOOD PANTIndividual grant recipient: $23,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA: $16,000 · Other+126 more: $253,455 · Other+126 moreBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,750 · PhilanthropyBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $23,500 · PhilanthropyBAY VETERANS FOUNDATIONBRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC: $20,150 · PhilanthropyBRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INCADOPTION OPTION INC: $25,200 · Human ServicesADOPTION …RIVER JORDAN INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesRIVER JOR…HIDDEN HARVEST: $9,750 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HA…UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesUNDERGROU…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesTONI & TRISH HOUSE FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL: $3,250 · Human Services+3 more: $3,750 · Human ServicesDELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $24,500 · EducationLITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC: $6,350 · EducationRECYCLE ACROSS AMERICA: $1,400 · EducationRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $26,530 · Housing & ShelterSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $16,652 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $2,400 · Environment1 FOR THE PLANET INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSAGINAW VALLEY NAVAL SHIP MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BAY CHORALE INC: $1,750 · Arts & CultureTEMPLEARTS: $1,250 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO 23: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$396,755Philanthropy$294,400Human Services$73,250Education$32,250Housing & Shelter$26,530Environment$21,052Arts & Culture$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,750 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY: $76,700 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $26,530 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBAY VETERANS FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC: $20,150 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetRIVER JORDAN INC: $19,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $16,652 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER: $11,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSAGINAW BAY COMMUNITY SAILING ASSOCIATION: $10,250 over 4y, 10% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $9,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC: $6,350 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetEast Side Soup Kitchen: $6,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFISH TALES: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $6,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAGINAW VALLEY NAVAL SHIP MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY INC: $4,850 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY: $4,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $3,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATE AND MARY IDA DOAN SANTA HOUSE: $3,750 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTONI & TRISH HOUSE FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL: $3,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $2,280 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER FAMILIES NAVIGATION & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBAY CITY FIREWORKS FESTIVAL: $2,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budget1 FOR THE PLANET INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCity Surf Project: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BAY CHORALE INC: $1,750 over 4y, 19% of budgetRECYCLE ACROSS AMERICA: $1,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEMPLEARTS: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9 Hero Guardians: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW DIMENSIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING BREAD VILLAGE: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBAY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRISM PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS VISION CLINIC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY MICHIGAN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arc of Midland: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ADOPTION OPTION INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAY VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN'S HOUSE COMMUNITY GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER JORDAN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW BAY COMMUNITY SAILING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds FISH TALES ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW VALLEY NAVAL SHIP MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATE AND MARY IDA DOAN SANTA HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bay Area Community FoundationMI55.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bay Area Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Russell H & Maxine E Smith Charitable Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · Morley Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · The Kantzler Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gougeon Employees Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gougeon Employees Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gougeon Employees Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gougeon Employees Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gougeon Employees’ filings →

    More from the funding graph