Skip to content

· Private foundation

Good Vibes Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$41kHousing & Shelter$16kHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPIC-CURE INC$25,000
THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANG$5,500
JIMMY JAM COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANG: $6k → 8%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANG: $1k → 8%JIMMY JAM COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81k · 3 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$81k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EPIC CURE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $66k · revenue +100%
  • SA
    St Augustine Society Inc
    2× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +49%
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
    2× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • VG
    VETERAN GARDEN PROJECT OF ST AUGUSTINE FLORIDA
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPIC CURE INC: $66,000 · Youth DevelopmentEPIC CURE INCThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $6,500 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's …JIMMY JAM COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJIMMY JAM COMMUN…SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS HO…St Augustine Society Inc: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSt Augustine S…ROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE …VETERAN GARDEN PROJECT OF ST AUGUSTINE FLORIDA: $6,000 · Other
Youth Development$66,000Human Services$14,500Housing & Shelter$13,000Other$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEPIC CURE INC: $66,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt Augustine Society Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Vibes Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Vibes Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Vibes’ filings →

More from the funding graph