Skip to content

· Private foundation

Good Shepherd Community Services Inc

$2k
Granted FY2021
16
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$700
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Religion$3kHealth$700Animals$100Housing & Shelter$100Human Services$100International$75Philanthropy$75Food & Nutrition$50
02FY2021 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dependent Baptist Church$700
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$50
Daily Bread Ministries$50
Shriners Hospital$50
Individual grant recipient$50
Spartanburg Humane Society$50
St Jude Hospital$50
Miracle Hill Mionistries$25
Make A Wish$25
Marine Toys for Tots$25
Mobile Meals$25
Samaritan Purse$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Spartanburg Humane Society: $50 → 15%Shriners Hospital: $50 → 13%Samaritan Purse: $25 → 21%Marine Toys for Tots: $25 → 7%Dependent Baptist Church: $700 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 7 repeat orgs$850 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$3k
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+49%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
HealthReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    Dependent Baptist Church
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $400
  • SH
    SPARTANBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100 · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100
  • DB
    DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $75 · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dependent Baptist Church: $2,500 · OtherDependent Baptist ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+15 more: $1,025 · Other+15 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $75 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $25 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75 · ReligionMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $25 · Human ServicesMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 · Philanthropy
Other$3,925Health$100Religion$75Human Services$25Philanthropy$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARTANBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARTANBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Shepherd Community Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Shepherd Community Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Good Shepherd Community Services Inc?

Find your warmest path to Good Shepherd Community Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Shepherd Community Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph