Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Good Hand Foundation Corp

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$204kCivil Rights$26kCommunity Improvement$20kInternational$18kFood & Nutrition$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kReligion$7kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$599k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM CAREY INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY EDEN VIGIL INSTITUTE$12,800
EARTH JUSTICE$8,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$6,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$6,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$6,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,000
FOODSHED ALLIANCE$2,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$2,000
BENNY'S BODEGA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Benny's Bodega: $2k → 6%Benny's Bodega: $2k → 6%BENNY'S BODEGA: $2k → 6%BENNY'S BODEGA: $1k → 6%BENNY'S BODEGA: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 16 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$296k
$19k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +82%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +202%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • WS
    We Stand With Paris
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FF
    Fair Fight Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Council On Environmental Economics and Development Union
Human Services
2
Environment Now
3
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
4
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
International Conservation Caucus Network

To advance conservation governance through political will and to provide "on the ground" solutions to ensure sustained economic benefits while managing the earth's natural resource wealth for future generations.

Unclassified
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
10
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Beyond Extreme Energy

Public education, outreach and communication related to the climate crisis and extreme energy.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Benny 'S Bodega a Nj Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARE OF CREATION INC — $43,500 · OtherCARE OF CREATION INCWILLIAM CAREY INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY EDEN VIGIL INSTITUTE — $31,800 · OtherWILLIAM CAREY INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY EDEN VIGIL INS…Frontier Ventures — $20,000 · OtherFrontier VenturesIndividual grant recipient — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWe Stand With Paris — $10,000 · OtherWe Stand With ParisSERGE GLOBAL INC — $7,000 · OtherSojourners Inc — $5,000 · OtherFair Fight Inc — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $10,600 · Other+4 moreEARTHJUSTICE — $42,150 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $40,150 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $40,150 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,000 · InternationalInternati…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,000 · InternationalWORLD CEN…BENNY 'S BODEGA A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $8,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY INC — $6,000 · Civil RightsINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $4,000 · Education
Other$148,900Environment$122,450International$26,000Human Services$8,000Civil Rights$6,000Education$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARE OF CREATION INC — $43,500 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $42,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $40,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $40,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENNY 'S BODEGA A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $8,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSojourners Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARE OF CREATION INC
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds BENNY 'S BODEGA A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Good Hand Foundation Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph