Skip to content

· Private foundation

Good Earth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$52kHealth$38kCrime & Legal$24kHousing & Shelter$23kReligion$20kHuman Services$17kYouth Development$16kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,420
Median grant
1
States reached
$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THERAGOOD DEEDS$8,000
KID'S MEALS$7,000
SMALL PLACES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CASA DE ESPERANZA$3,420
LORD OF THE STREETS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,500
EL CENTRO DE CORAZON$2,500
HOUSTON RECOVERY CENTER$2,500
THE COUNCIL ON RECOVERY$2,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOMEN'S HOME: $5k → 16%WOMEN'S HOME: $3k → 16%WOMEN'S HOME: $3k → 16%WOMEN'S HOME: $2k → 16%WOMEN'S HOME: $2k → 16%WOMEN'S HOME: $1k → 16%AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $7k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $5k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $5k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $5k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $5k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $3k → 16%KIDS' MEALS INC: $2k → 16%KIDS' MEALS INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 22 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$228k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+10%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KIDS' MEALS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +579%
  • EC
    EL CENTRO DE CORAZON
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S HOME
    6× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR MIND BODY HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • PE
    PRISON ENTREPENEURIAL PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
2
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
3
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
4
Central Houston Civic Improvement Inc

Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.

Community Improvement
5
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
6
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
8
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
9
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
10
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Houston Area Community Services

Our mission is to provide high quality and caring services to promote healthy people and communities.

Health
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Prelude Music Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES: $18,000 · OtherCORRECTIONAL MINISTRIESCASA DE ESPERANZA: $14,170 · OtherCASA DE ESPERANZALORD OF THE STREETS: $12,500 · OtherLORD OF THE STREETSST AGNES ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherST AGNES ACADEMYLIVING FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $10,000 · OtherLIVING FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPThe Houston Food Bank: $9,500 · OtherThe Houston Food BankIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherHOUSTON RECOVERY CENTER: $5,000 · OtherCHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC: $5,750 · Other+15 more: $35,500 · Other+15 moreKIDS' MEALS INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INCTHE WOMEN'S HOME: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S HOME+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $19,500 · Crime & LegalEL CENTRO…Christian New Creation Inc: $2,000 · Crime & LegalChristian…THERAGOOD DEEDS INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $7,500 · HealthThe Council on Recovery: $6,500 · HealthGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $1,000 · PhilanthropySmall Places: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$145,420Human Services$49,500Crime & Legal$21,500Youth Development$16,000Health$14,000Philanthropy$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $19,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmall Places: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Council on Recovery: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC: $5,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHouston Botanic Garden: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristian New Creation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME RUN HITTERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAVDA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
  • Who funds THERAGOOD DEEDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Small Places ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds The Council on Recovery ↗
  • Who funds CHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Botanic Garden ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Harris County ↗
  • Who funds Christian New Creation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOME RUN HITTERS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AVDA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX22.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Strake Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · The Brown Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Medallion Foundation Inc · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · Mechia Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · John S Dunn Foundation · Wayne Duddlesten Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Earth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Earth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Good Earth Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Good Earth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Earth’s filings →

More from the funding graph