Skip to content
Golf Fights Cancer Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Golf Fights Cancer Inc

Golf fights cancer (gfc) taps into the passion and generosity of all golfers to raise much needed funds for cancer related organizations and families living with the disease.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$460k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$10.0MRecreation & Sports$500kPhilanthropy$85kHuman Services$50k
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 33 grants below total $2,250,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,300,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $416k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $460k
$35,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$460,000
DETECTOGETHER$225,000
ONE MISSION$175,000
LET'S WIN PANCREATIC$150,000
UF HEALTH$135,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$100,000
BEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER$100,000
CHANDLER CHICCO AGENCY LLC$100,000
MARISA'S MISSION$91,500
DREAMS COME TRUE$75,000
LIVESTRONG HOCKOMOCK YMCA$60,000
LIFESPAN CORPORATION$60,000
ONE SUMMIT$52,500
MADDIE'S PROMISE$50,000
FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIA'S MIRACLES: $35k → 10%CHAD TOUGH: $10k → 14%MICHAEL FLANNAGAN FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%TOMMY'S PLACE: $50k → 17%RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY: $30k → 10%MIA'S MIRACLES: $25k → 10%MICHAEL FLANNAGAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%LIVESTRONG HOCKOMOCK YMCA: $60k → 11%MIA'S MIRACLES: $25k → 10%RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY: $10k → 10%MIA'S MIRACLES: $25k → 10%CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%LIVESTRONG AT THE HOCKOMOCK YMCA: $10k → 11%CHRISTOPHER'S HAVEN: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
VA
MD
AZ
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 32 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
19

Total granted

$8.9M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+33%

Still filing today

88%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +162%
  • DI
    DETECTOGETHER INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE 15-40 CONNECTION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $500k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • CW
    CAPE WELLNESS COLLABORATIVE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -8% · 39% of their budget
  • NL
    NYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $226k · revenue +33%
  • CC
    CAPE COD HEALTHCARE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
2
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
5
We Beat Cancer
Philanthropy
6
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
10
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
11
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
12
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Robyn's Rainbows Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/55
Grantees still filing
43/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,228,800 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncDETECTOGETHER INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE 15-40 CONNECTION INC: $1,073,000 · HealthDETECTOGETHER INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE 15-40 CONNECTION INCCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $458,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONONE MISSION INC: $426,000 · HealthONE MISSION INCLifespan Corporation: $380,000 · HealthLifespan CorporationBEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $345,000 · HealthJOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC: $326,000 · HealthCAPE WELLNESS COLLABORATIVE INC: $250,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $226,200 · Health+28 more: $1,884,569 · Health+28 moreMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $692,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORP…NEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherNEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL C…Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $456,500 · OtherChildrens Cancer Therapy De…DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $225,000 · OtherDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSON…TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PARENT INC: $215,100 · OtherTUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PARENT…CAPE COD HEALTHCARE INC: $200,000 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE INCFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $128,000 · OtherCHANDLER CHICCO AGENCY LLC: $100,000 · Other+2 more: $90,000 · OtherTEAM IMPACT INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $245,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $12,500 · PhilanthropyAPRYLE SHOWERS FOUNDATION INC: $216,717 · Human ServicesMIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesHOCKOMOCK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $70,423 · Human ServicesChristopher's Haven Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL H FLANAGAN FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesCamp Casco Inc: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsYale University: $20,000 · Education
Health$6,597,569Other$2,606,600Philanthropy$757,500Human Services$587,140Recreation & Sports$45,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,228,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETECTOGETHER INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE 15-40 CONNECTION INC: $1,073,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $500,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $458,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $456,500 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $426,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetLifespan Corporation: $380,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $345,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetJOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC: $326,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetCAPE WELLNESS COLLABORATIVE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $245,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $226,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC: $225,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOne Summit Inc: $217,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetAPRYLE SHOWERS FOUNDATION INC: $216,717 over 6y, 60% of budgetMADDIES PROMISE INC: $200,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC: $185,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARISA'S MISSION INC: $171,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRhode Island Hospital: $127,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $119,369 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOCKOMOCK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $70,423 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANNAS PALS INC: $60,000 over 1y, 91% of budgetLUCY'S LOVE BUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $60,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetChristopher's Haven Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE SAMFUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTommy's Place Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetThe Donna Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCamp Casco Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MICHAEL H FLANAGAN FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBYN'S RAINBOWS INC: $22,500 over 1y, 83% of budgetANGELHAIR INC: $21,500 over 2y, 33% of budgetRETT'S ROOST: $20,500 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCommunity Hospice of Northeast Florida Foundation for Caring Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE OF BOSTON INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYale University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIN THE PINK BOUTIQUE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent): $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joy In Childhood Foun…Eastern Bank Foundati…Citizens Charitable F…DCU for KidsGivenGain Foundation …Boston Foundation IncThe New England Patri…Cummings Foundation G…Pga Tour IncSalem Five Charitable…Arbella Insurance Fou…Haymakers for Hope Inc
Joy In Childhood Foundation IncMA31.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · DCU for Kids · GivenGain Foundation USA · Boston Foundation Inc · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Pga Tour Inc · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Haymakers for Hope Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Golf Fights Cancer Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Golf Fights Cancer Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 270%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
  • Maddies Promise Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • V for Victory of Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
27get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Golf Fights Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home