Loading…
· Private foundation
GOLDSMITH FAMILY FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$38k
Granted FY2025
6
Grants
6
Communities
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Education$120kHealth$72kInternational$18kPublic Benefit$3kOther$43k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
medical research
2022
medical research
2023
medical research
2024
medical research
2025
medical research
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
- PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$15,000
- ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT$5,000
- DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP$5,000
- MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
- WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,000
- BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES$4,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$249k · 7 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
7
3
Total granted
$249k
$7k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+72%
+206%
Still filing today
86%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthInternationalEducationPublic BenefitOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY8× · 2018–2025 · $120k · revenue +21%- DRDUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +18%
- ACACCELERATED CURE PROJECT5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- CICATO INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +71%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +206%
- FOFREINDS OF UNITED HATZALAHone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Arc Research Institute
Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress and understand the root causes of complex diseases. This challenge requires researchers across many disciplines to study fundamental biological mechanisms, develop new technologies, and…
Health
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
The provision of education, research, and charitable patient care services.
Education
3
Trustees of Boston College
Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…
Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Education
5
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc
Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…
—
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company
the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.
Education
7
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation
The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…
Health
8
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Inc
Conduct cutting edge medical research
Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Health
10
Breakthrough Energy Catalyst Foundation
Breakthrough Energy is accelerating transformation by supporting cutting-edge research and development,investing in companies that turn green ideas into clean products, and (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)
Environment
11
World Food Prize Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Globalization of Pharmaceutics
To foster and facilitate international scientific exchange in the pharmaceutical sciences.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Multiple Myeloma Research and the most unlike its peers is World Central Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$120,000Health$72,000Other$43,000International$18,000Public Benefit$2,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRINCETON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation GOLDSMITH FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~52 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 263886958 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 52 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Goldsmith Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Goldsmith Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines