Skip to content
Gloria Nader Mishkoff Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Gloria Nader Mishkoff Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$144kHousing & Shelter$62kArts & Culture$30kHuman Services$15kInternational$15kEducation$13kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COHEN CHILDRENS MED CENTER NORTHWELL$15,000
EASTER SEALS NEW YORK INC$12,000
WOMEN IN NEED INC$12,000
OPPORTUNITY MUSIC PROJECT INC$10,000
CHILDREN OF HOPE$10,000
CHILDRENS HEALTH FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CHILDRENS MUSIC FUND: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $20k → 17%HUDSON GUILD - YOUTH EDUCATION: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $5k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
SD
PA
CA
VA
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 6 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$162k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue -39%
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue -11%
  • CC
    COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +5%
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MUSIC FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -39%
  • M
    MUSICAN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
5
The Children's Aid Society

Children's aid helps children in poverty to succeed and thrive. we do this by providing comprehensive supports to children and their families in targeted, high-needs new york city neighborhoods. (continued on schedule o)continuation of…

Human Services
6
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
7
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
8
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
9
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Sesame Workshop

Sesame workshop's mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger and kinder. (see schedule o)

Arts & Culture
12
The Committee for Hispanic Children and Families Inc

The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Music Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCOHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERThe Children's Health Fund: $20,000 · OtherThe Children's Health FundCOHEN CHILDRENS MED CENTER NORTHWELL: $15,000 · OtherCOHEN CHILDRENS MED CENTER NORTHWELLEASTER SEALS NEW YORK INC: $12,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS NEW YORK INCMUSICAN: $10,000 · OtherMUSICANNYC VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NY: $10,000 · OtherNYC VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NYCHILDREN OF HOPE: $10,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF HOPESAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATIONHEBREW ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE: $40,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEHUDSON GUILDINC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON GUILDINCWOMEN IN NEED INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INCCHILDRENS MUSIC FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS MUSIC FUNDTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $32,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · InternationalOpportunity Music Project: $10,000 · Arts & CultureACTION FOR HEALTHY KIDS: $8,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$122,000Human Services$87,000Health$52,000International$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Education$8,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS NEW YORK INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS MUSIC FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTION FOR HEALTHY KIDS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gloria Nader Mishkoff Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gloria Nader Mishkoff Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gloria Nader Mishkoff Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home