· Public charity
Global Fund for a New Economy Inc
Our mission is to support the social infrastructure needed to turn new economic thinking into real-world policy and practice: the networks of institutions, relationships, and shared norms that enable people to organize, build power, and translate ideas into action.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $2,424,025 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,004,025 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $580,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACTION CENTER ON RACE AND THE ECONOMY INSTITUTE | $1,000,000 |
| GOODNATION FOUNDATION INC | $342,500 |
| SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION | $242,500 |
| AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND | $150,000 |
| OIL & GAS ACTION NETWORK | $135,000 |
| UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| WORKING PARTNERSHIP USA | $65,000 |
| ACCE INSTITUTE | $65,000 |
| PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVE INC | $50,000 |
| SLUDGE | $50,000 |
| OXFAM AMERICA INC | $50,000 |
| AI NOW INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT | $50,000 |
| TIDES CENTER | $25,000 |
| NGO SOURCE TECHSOUP | $14,025 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $580k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SUPPORT THE TRANSFORMS PROJECT · SUPPORT FOR BRAZIL COMMS HUB · GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: TEACHING MATERIALS FOR BOOK · GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: EU TAX OVSERVATORY
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…
Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…
The climate equity action fund (ceaf) works hand-in-hand with community-based partners in critical states across the country to secure and sustain policy wins for climate and clean energy. building on over a decade of trust with leading…
The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…
Our mission is to build and mobilize a network of partners across the energy access ecosystem that together can accelerate the adoption of decentralized renewable energy.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To lay the foundation for a strong, stable, and ethical financial system.
Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.
The foundation for global compact is a non profit organization established to help raise funds to support the work of the un global compact office and global compact-related activities.
ACT Institute leads the just, equitable and rapid transition to a clean energy future and diverse climate economy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Economic Liberties Project and the most unlike its peers is Participatory Politics Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Action Center on Race & the Economy Institute ↗
- Who funds Goodnation Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OIL & GAS ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ACCE Institute ↗
- Who funds Working Partnerships USA ↗
- Who funds PARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds TECHSOUP GLOBAL ↗
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Global Fund for a New Economy Inc?
Find your warmest path to Global Fund for a New Economy Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.