Skip to content

· Private foundation

Global Action to End Smoking Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$19MSocial Science$14MScience & Tech$13MEducation$12MCommunity Improvement$10MInternational$8.6MFood & Nutrition$3.0MCivil Rights$2.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $10,554,482, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,151,651 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,597,169 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+14 grants · $8.8M
$197,885
Median grant
7
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Knowledge Action Change Limited$1,474,217
Knowledge Action Change Limited$1,160,352
Land O'Lakes Venture37$1,064,346
Cornell University$969,451
Rose Research Center, LLC$723,504
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources$505,382
BOTEC Analysis, LLC$457,728
Centre for Health Research and Education Limited$435,000
National Harm Reduction Coalition$392,595
San Diego State University Research Foundation$379,161
Healthy Initiatives$376,660
Urban Institute$306,819
Centre for Health Research and Education Limited$299,126
Urban Institute$255,679
Michigan State University$199,589
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69M · 41 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
41

Total granted

$69M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-45%
+41%

Still filing today

7%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    Knowledge Action Change Limited
    5× · 2020–2025 · $9.3M
  • LO
    Land O'Lakes Venture37
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8.7M
  • CF
    Centre for Health Research and Education Limited
    5× · 2020–2025 · $8.6M

Funded once

  • EI
    Euromonitor International Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $1.9M
  • SI
    Sustainability Inc.
    one grant, 2020 · $1.5M
  • CU
    Cornell University
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Foundation for Public Giving; the most unlike its peers is Land O'lakes VENTURE37. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Knowledge Action Change Limited: $9,254,516 · OtherKnowledge Action Change LimitedLand O'Lakes Venture37: $8,668,633 · OtherLand O'Lakes Venture37Centre for Health Research and Education Limited: $8,603,995 · OtherCentre for Health Research and Education LimitedRose Research Center, LLC: $7,969,405 · OtherRose Research Center, LLCEuromonitor International Limited: $3,493,801 · OtherLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources: $2,823,807 · OtherMichigan State University (MSU): $2,675,000 · OtherMichigan State University: $2,670,887 · Other+70 more: $33,271,996 · Other+70 moreCornell University: $3,784,056 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $379,161 · EducationThe Conrad Foundation: $290,000 · EducationINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $1,788,520 · InternationalLAND O'LAKES VENTURE37: $1,064,346 · InternationalINFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC: $503,955 · HealthNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $392,595 · HealthTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $562,498 · Social ScienceHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $500,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $169,195 · Community ImprovementPhysicians Research Institute: $95,100 · Community Improvement
Other$79,432,040Education$4,453,217International$2,852,866Health$896,550Social Science$562,498Philanthropy$500,000Community Improvement$264,295

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornell University: $3,784,056 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $1,788,520 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLAND O'LAKES VENTURE37: $1,064,346 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetINFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC: $503,955 over 3y, 51% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $500,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $379,161 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Conrad Foundation: $290,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetPhysicians Research Institute: $95,100 over 3y, 61% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAND O'LAKES VENTURE37 ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING ↗
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Global Action to End Smoking Inc?

Find your warmest path to Global Action to End Smoking Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Global Action to End Smoking’s filings →

More from the funding graph