Skip to content

· Public charity

Givelify Give-Com Foundation

The nonprofit is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$253kPhilanthropy$231kEducation$125kArts & Culture$100kInternational$83kHealth$10k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $428,106, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,472,055 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,043,949 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
$11,661
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$75,000
DRC2 COGIC CONGO$59,072
LIBERATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$51,143
AMBASSADOR SEED OF LOVE CHURCH INC$32,371
NEW BEGINNING MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$22,826
KINGDOM LIVING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$22,470
ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH$20,344
NEW VISION BAPTIST CHURCH$15,394
MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH$13,356
JOINT NATIONAL BAPTIST SESSION$12,225
EMPOWER OUTREACH MINISTRY$11,661
ZION CITY OF DAVID$11,505
CONFLUENCE CHURCH$10,038
EMBASSY CHRISTIAN CENTER INC$10,035
ONENESS PENTECOSTAL TABERNACLE$9,139
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMBASSADOR SEED OF LOVE CHURCH INC: $32k → 22%The Bridge Ministries: $19k → 10%Waco Theater Center: $100k → 14%ONENESS PENTECOSTAL TABERNACLE: $9k → 13%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES AND MISSION SOCIETY-ICMMS: $9k → 8%ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH: $20k → 10%ZION CITY OF DAVID: $12k → 14%TRUE LIGHT BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%Kingdom Fellowship DC: $10k → 14%EMBASSY CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $10k → 12%National Baptist Convention USA Inc: $25k → 14%Church of God in Christ: $30k → 17%WORD OF FAITH: $8k → 17%EMPOWER OUTREACH MINISTRY: $12k → 7%MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH: $13k → 10%JONES CHAPEL CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $8k → 21%DRC2 COGIC Congo: $70k → 8%MACEDONIA BAPTIST CHURCH: $7k → 11%GREATER PEACE CHURCH MACON: $6k → 23%KINGDOM LIVING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $22k → 14%NEW VISION BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 26%NEW BEGINNING MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $23k → 6%LIBERATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $51k → 19%DUNAMIS TEMPLE: $8k → 22%DAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $10k → 14%JOINT NATIONAL BAPTIST SESSION: $12k → 14%DRC2 COGIC CONGO: $59k → 8%Kingdom Living International Ministries: $12k → 14%New Beginning Missionary Baptist Church: $16k → 6%Liberation Fellowship Church: $20k → 19%National Baptist Convention USA Inc: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
PA
CA
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $885k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$885k · 100% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: FACILITATION OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO QUALIFIED FOREIGN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE ORGANIZATION'S EXEMPT PURPOSE TO CONNECT DONORS WITH CHARITABLE CAUSES AND INCREASE PUBLIC CHARITABLE IMPACT.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of Givelify Give-Com Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 6% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 51%.

Givelify Give-Com Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field
05the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO SECOND ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION COGIC: $70,478 · OtherDEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO SECOND ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION COGICDRC2 COGIC CONGO: $59,072 · OtherDRC2 COGIC CONGOLIBERATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $51,143 · OtherLIBERATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCHNATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION USA INC: $35,000 · OtherNATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION USA INCAMBASSADOR SEED OF LOVE CHURCH INCORPORATED: $32,371 · OtherAMBASSADOR SEED OF LOVE CHURCH INCORPORATEDRESTORATION AND DELIVERANCE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNING MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $22,826 · OtherKINGDOM LIVING INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $22,470 · OtherLiberation Fellowship Church: $20,498 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD: $20,344 · OtherThe Bridge Ministries: $19,416 · Other+18 more: $183,580 · Other+18 moreIndiana University Foundation: $125,000 · EducationIndiana Universit…WACO THEATER CENTER: $100,000 · Arts & CultureWACO THEATER C…DAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $10,000 · International
Other$567,198Education$125,000Arts & Culture$100,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWACO THEATER CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WACO THEATER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Givelify Give-Com Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Givelify Give-Com Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Givelify Give-Com’s filings →

    More from the funding graph