· Public charity
Georgia Tech Foundation Inc
It is the mission of the georgia tech foundation, inc., to: 1.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $285k
- $250k+5 grants · $167M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $116,593,824 |
| GEORGIA TECH FACILITIES INC | $39,297,303 |
| GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $7,065,738 |
| GEORGIA TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $3,330,483 |
| EMORY UNIVERSITY | $888,959 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $100,000 |
| GEORGIA TECH GLOBAL INC | $85,000 |
| MOREHOUSE COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY | $47,393 |
| TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY | $24,014 |
| FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY | $22,439 |
| SAVANNAH STATE UNIVERSITY | $17,500 |
| JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY | $14,450 |
| GEORGIA TECH FOUNDAITION REAL ESTATE HOLDING CORPORATION | $14,030 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GTGEORGIA TECH FACILITIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $47M · revenue +500% · 44% of their budget
- GTGEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $31M · revenue +179%
- GTGEORGIA TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $30M · revenue +14% · 56% of their budget
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2025 · $100k
- ASAlbany State Universityone grant, 2025 · $50k
- CAClark Atlanta University Incone grant, 2025 · $47k · revenue 0%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The georgia tech research corporation (gtrc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance, and economic development.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The georgia tech applied research corporation (gtarc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance and economic development.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
It is the mission of the georgia tech foundation, inc., to: 1. promote the cause of higher education in the state of georgia; 2. receive and manage financial donations received by the foundation for support and enhancement of the georgia…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Augusta university research institute, inc. (the "institute") was incorporated under the laws of the state of georgia as a nonprofit corporation on july 31, 1980. the institute qualified as a tax-exempt corporation under section 501(c)(3)…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FACILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION FUNDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION REAL ESTATE HOLDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Georgia Tech Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgia Tech Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Georgia Tech’s filings →