Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Illinois · Public charity

George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club

The Boys and Girls Club Movement is a nationwide affiliation of local autonomous organizations and Boys and Girls Club of America working to help youth of all backgrounds, with specific concern for those from disadvantaged circumstances to develop the qualities necessary to become productive members of society.

$28k
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
1
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$27,780
Largest grant, FY2017
$27,780
States reached, FY2017
1
Total assets, FY2017
$1.6M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Naperville Youth Club$27,7801n/a

Compare George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club with peer funders

About George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club

How much does George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club give?
George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club reported 1 grants totaling $27,780 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Youth Development (100%).
Who are George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Naperville Youth Club ($28k).
Where is George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club based?
George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home