Skip to content

· Private foundation

George M White Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$198kHealth$138kYouth Development$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$42kArts & Culture$33kAnimals$30kReligion$30kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$5,507
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS$10,326
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$10,326
THE CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC$6,884
Individual grant recipient$6,884
GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO$6,592
WESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY$6,592
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,507
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,819
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$3,442
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,442
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKES PEAK REGION$3,442
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$3,442
PIKES PEAK HOSPICE & PALLATIVE CARE$2,065
CARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK$1,377
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $11k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CO SPRINGS: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$601k · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$601k
$5k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +60%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +120%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
2
Pathways Hospice

Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.

Human Services
3
Set of Colorado Springs

S.e.t. of colorado springs is made up of a small multi-skilled staff and a large corps of volunteers, including many in the medical professions. s.e.t. of colorado springs collaborates with other care-givers in the pikes peak area to teach…

—
4
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
Commonspirit Mountain Region

We extend the healing ministry of christ by caring for those who are ill and by nurturing the health of the people in our communities.

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

To improve patient care by advancing the science & practice of clinical nutrition & metabolism.

Food & Nutrition
10
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
11
Sierra Nevada Memorial - Miners Hospital

Sierra nevada memorial hospital ("snmh") is committed to improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
12
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,023 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $60,023 · OtherTHE CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $42,684 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $30,012 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPIKES PEAK COUNCIL: $20,134 · OtherPIKES PEAK COUNCILAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,134 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $18,007 · OtherPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $9,878 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $9,404 · Other+1 more: $5,333 · OtherB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $90,035 · Human ServicesB COS WE CARE FOR OUR …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,611 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $90,035 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,878 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SO…GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO: $33,162 · Youth DevelopmentWESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY: $33,162 · Arts & CultureHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $30,012 · AnimalsCare and Share Inc: $12,004 · Food & Nutrition
Other$275,632Human Services$122,646Health$99,913Youth Development$33,162Arts & Culture$33,162Animals$30,012Food & Nutrition$12,004

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $90,035 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $90,035 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO: $33,162 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY: $33,162 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,611 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $30,012 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $18,007 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $12,004 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,878 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joseph Henry Edmondson FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George M White Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George M White Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George M White Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009’s filings →

More from the funding graph