· Private foundation
George G & Amelia G Tapper Foundation Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of GEORGE G & AMELIA G TAPPER FOUNDATION TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PORT THEATRE ART & CULTURE CTR INC | $25,000 |
| BAY AREA CHORAL SOCIETY | $6,000 |
| SAME CAFE | $5,500 |
| JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE | $5,000 |
| GULF COAST CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY | $5,000 |
| GULF COAST IMPACT 100 | $3,000 |
| ST JOSEPH BAY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,500 |
| PORT ST JOE HIGH SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE GULF | $1,000 |
| LOVE OF LITERACY INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC7× · 2017–2023 · $72k · revenue +160%
- SJST JOSEPH BAY HUMANE SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +100%
- BABAY AREA CHORAL SOCIETY INC2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +267% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- BBBEACH BAPTIST CHAPELone grant, 2018 · $10k
- GCGULF COUNTY SENIOR CITENS CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF MEXICO BEACone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protect abused and neglected children.
The specific purpose of this corporation is to promote sustainable tourism, raise environmental awareness, and encourage the stewardship of natural resources in order to increase community resilience, strengthen the coastal economy, and…
Provide scientific, environmental research and education for environmental conservation, preservation, restoration, recycling, and environmental planning
Perform concerts and teach music
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Children's Advocacy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Choral Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PORT THEATRE AND CULTURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH BAY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL SONGWRITERS EDUCATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE EMERALD COAST VOLUNTEER GUILD INC ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The St Joe Community Foundation Inc · Murphy Family Foundation LLC Murphy Family Foundation LLC · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George G & Amelia G Tapper Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gulf Coast Children's Advocacy Center Inc — 51% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.