Skip to content

· Private foundation

George G & Alva Hudson Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$192kYouth Development$150kRecreation & Sports$100kFood & Nutrition$94kArts & Culture$78kCommunity Improvement$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kPhilanthropy$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$29,000
HILLSBORO LIONS CLUB$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HILL COUNTY$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
LAKE WHITNEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$11,500
HILL COUNTY PAW PALS$6,500
HILL COUNTY KIDS$4,000
HUBBARD GARDEN CLUB$2,000
MISSION HILLSBORO MEDICAL CLINIS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MEALS ON WHEELS WACO: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of George G & Alva Hudson Smith Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 89%.

George G & Alva Hudson Smith Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 15 repeat orgs$427k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +144% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
33

Total granted

$550k
$356k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+26%

Still filing today

33%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HILLSBORO CITY LIBRARY
    3× · 2018–2024 · $173k · revenue ×14
  • LW
    LAKE WHITNEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +14%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTY PAW PALS
    4× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +237%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB HILL COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HILL COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HI
    HILLSBORO INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k · revenue +57% · 31% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hunt Volunteer Fire Department

Providing fire protection and medical assistance to residents in the hunt, texas community

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Weslaco Museum of Local History and Cultural Art

The organization's mission is to collect, preserve, exhibit and promote the history, cultural arts, and past traditions of weslaco, texas, and its surrounding region.

—
3
Wellington Volunteer Fire Department Inc

None

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Waller County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical sites and objects

Arts & Culture
5
Friends of the Corsicana Public Library
Education
6
Hillsboro Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department serving hillsboro, wv and surrounding areas

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Lewisville Historical Society

To discover, collect and promote the preservation of lewisville history and preserve its historical landmarks

Arts & Culture
8
Texas Barnstorming Museum

Preserving historical aircraft

Arts & Culture
9
Hankamer Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire fighting & ambulance service to hankamer, texas and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Melvin Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Wimberley Village Library Foundation

To raise funds for capital projects undertaken by the Wimberley Village Library

Public Benefit
12
Garrison Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Through Time Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hill County Paw Pals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HILL COUNTY: $89,720 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HILL COUNTYHILLSBORO FOUNDATION INC: $41,700 · OtherHILLSBORO FOUNDATION INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB HILL COUNTY: $36,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherHILLSBORO LIONS CLUB: $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HILL COUNTY: $25,000 · OtherHILLSBORO INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC: $24,691 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,630 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherCENTRAL TEXAS SENIOR MINISTRY(MEALSWHEELS): $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,989 · Other+34 more: $318,300 · Other+34 moreFRIENDS OF HILLSBORO CITY LIBRARY: $173,333 · EducationFRIENDS OF HILLSBORO…MISSION HILLSBORO MEDICAL CLINIC: $34,500 · HealthLAKE WHITNEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $29,700 · Community ImprovementHILL COUNTY PAW PALS: $22,700 · AnimalsCOVINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterLake Whitney Arts Association: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS THROUGH TIME INC: $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$684,530Education$173,333Health$34,500Community Improvement$29,700Animals$22,700Public Safety & Disaster$17,500Arts & Culture$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF HILLSBORO CITY LIBRARY: $173,333 over 3y, 16% of budgetMISSION HILLSBORO MEDICAL CLINIC: $34,500 over 6y, 28% of budgetLAKE WHITNEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $29,700 over 3y, 14% of budgetHILLSBORO INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC: $24,691 over 2y, 31% of budgetHILL COUNTY PAW PALS: $22,700 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetCOVINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $17,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetLake Whitney Arts Association: $12,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WACO: $8,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HILLSBORO CITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HILLSBORO MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE WHITNEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSBORO INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTY PAW PALS ↗
  • Who funds COVINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Whitney Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WACO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dorothy Gaines FoundationTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dorothy Gaines Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George G & Alva Hudson Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George G & Alva Hudson Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George G & Alva Hudson Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph