Skip to content

· Private foundation

George E Haggart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$26kAnimals$6kHousing & Shelter$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kFood & Nutrition$4kCommunity Improvement$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$162k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
K9S FOR WARRIORS$2,500
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$2,500
FRASER LIMITED$2,000
YWCA$2,000
GREAT PLAINS FOOD BANK$1,136
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%The American Red Cross: $1k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of George E Haggart Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in ND; by stated purpose, 41%.

George E Haggart Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$51k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+204%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +39%
  • CU
    CHURCHES UNITED
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FL
    FRAZER LIMITED
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • FL
    FRASIER LIMITED
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • FL
    FRAISER LIMITED
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
2
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
3
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
4
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
5
Upper Valley Humane Society Inc

UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.

Animals
6
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
7
Live Free Animal Rescue

To rescue abandoned, neglected and traumatized animals and find these animals their furever homes.

Animals
8
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
9
Animal Shelter of Wood River Valley Dba Mountain Humane

We are on a mission to change lives by connecting pets and people. We dothis through innovative programs that inspire and have impact beyond ourborders. We envision a compassionate community where all animals arerecognized for their…

Animals
10
National Disaster Search Dog Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen disaster response in america by rescuing and recruiting dogs and partnering them with firefighters and other first responders to find people buried alive in the wreckage of disasters.

Health
11
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
12
Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless

Feeding pets of the homeless believes in the healing power of companion pets and the human/animal bond which is very important in the lives of many homeless. they find solace, protection and companionship through their pets. they care for…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is K9S for Warriors Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leech Lake Legacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $9,500 · OtherYWCAFRASER LIMITED: $5,500 · OtherFRASER LIMITEDSalvation Army: $2,023 · OtherSalvation ArmyFRAZER LIMITED: $1,500 · OtherFRAZER LIMITEDFRASIER LIMITED: $1,000 · OtherFRAISER LIMITED: $1,000 · OtherSALAVATION ARMY: $969 · OtherSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS IN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross…CHURCHES UNITED: $6,000 · ReligionCHURCHES UN…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $4,500 · AnimalsK9S FOR WAR…HOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $1,000 · AnimalsHOMEWARD AN…Leech Lake Legacy: $500 · AnimalsLeech Lake …GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,500 · PhilanthropyGARY SINIS…Great Plains Food Bank: $3,865 · Food & Nutrition
Other$21,492Human Services$14,000Religion$6,000Animals$6,000Philanthropy$5,500Food & Nutrition$3,865

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $3,865 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeech Lake Legacy: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Leech Lake Legacy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George E Haggart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George E Haggart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George E Haggart’s filings →

More from the funding graph