Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Mildred Falk Charitable Trust

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$15kReligion$12kHealth$10kYouth Development$8kEducation$6kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$1kFood & Nutrition$750
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARK UNIVERSITY$5,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON$3,585
BOSTON MUSIC PROJECT$2,000
JEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
CENTRAL MA FOOD RESCUE$750
WALNUT HILL SCHOOL FOR PERFORMING ARTS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%WALNUT HILL SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $500 → 8%CENTRAL MA FOOD RESCUE: $750 → 11%BOSTON MUSIC PROJECT: $2k → 16%SUSAN G KOMEN: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH CALIFORNIA: $1k → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $1k → 7%GOUCHER COLLEGE: $500 → 11%WALNUT HILL SCHOOL FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $500 → 8%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%JOSIAH QUINCY ORCHESTRA PROGRAM: $2k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%THE CLARK FUND: $5k → 11%JOSIAH QUINCY ORCHESTRA PROGRAM: $2k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%THE CLARK FUND: $5k → 11%JOSIAH QUINCY ORCHESTRA PROGRAM: $2k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%THE CLARK FUND: $3k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON: $4k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $2k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON: $4k → 16%TEMPLE EMANUEL SINAI: $1k → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON: $4k → 16%JEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER INC: $1k → 11%WGBH: $500 → 16%JEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37k · 5 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +378% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$37k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+378%
+40%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLARK FUND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON
    3× · 2018–2020 · $11k
  • BM
    BOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +378%

Funded once

  • SG
    SUSAN G KOMEN
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +543%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Centre College

Centre college is a small, independent, and selective educational community dedicated to study in the liberal arts as a means to develop the intellectual, personal, and moral potential of its students. centre nurtures in its students the…

Education
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Northeastern University
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walnut Hill Center for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nami National. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLARK FUND: $12,500 · OtherTHE CLARK FUNDTEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTON: $10,665 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL - BOSTONPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD+6 more: $5,000 · Other+6 moreBOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC: $7,900 · Arts & CultureBOSTON MUSIC PROJ…TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF …GOUCHER COLLEGE: $500 · EducationGOUCHER COLL…WALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 · EducationWALNUT HILL …JEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthNAMI National: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $2,200 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL MA FOOD RESCUE INC: $750 · Food & Nutrition
Other$32,165Arts & Culture$7,900Education$6,000Health$3,500Philanthropy$2,200Food & Nutrition$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC: $7,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Mildred Falk Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Mildred Falk Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Jewish Healthcare Center Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Boston Music Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George & Mildred Falk Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to George & Mildred Falk Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Mildred Falk’s filings →

More from the funding graph