Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$83kEducation$38kHuman Services$37kAnimals$27kYouth Development$17kReligion$9kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Oregon Humane Society$5,000
Pink Lemonade Project$5,000
Boys & Girls Club of Salem$2,000
Family Building Blocks$2,000
Gilbert House$2,000
Salem Harvest$1,500
Friends of Pimpollo$1,500
Salem Fire Foundation$1,000
Oregon Energy Fund$1,000
The Asher House$1,000
Catholic Community Services$1,000
Santiam Hospital Clinics Foundation$1,000
Salem Health Foundation$1,000
Oregon Zoo$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Kids Wish Network: $504 → 12%Wounded Warrior Project: $50 → 14%Pink Lemonade Project: $5k → 9%Kids Wish Network: $450 → 12%Pink Lemonade Project: $5k → 9%Kids Wish Network: $252 → 12%Pink Lemonade Project: $5k → 9%Pink Lemonade Project: $5k → 9%Family Building Blocks: $13k → 14%Family Building Blocks: $2k → 14%Family Building Blocks: $2k → 14%Family Building Blocks: $1k → 14%Liberty House: $2k → 14%Liberty House: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
OR
SD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 90%.

George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$224k · 36 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
10

Total granted

$224k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+17%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2023 · $36k · revenue +94%
  • PINK LEMONADE PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +120%
  • FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $18k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • AH
    Ananda House LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • GB
    GREAT BLUE SONG PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SJ
    St Joseph Family Shelter
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salem Health

To improve the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
2
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
3
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
4
Oregon Hospice and Palliative Care

The oregon hospice and palliative care association is committed to improving the quality of life for oregonians at the end of life and supporting the hospice and palliative care agencies that provide care.

Human Services
5
Oregon Public Broadcasting

Connecting people across oregon and the pacific northwest through the power of a shared story.

Arts & Culture
6
Willamette Family Medical Center Inc

Providing health care services

Health
7
Legacy Health Foundation

Legacy Health Foundation (LHF) was incorporated on August 21, 2013. The mission of the foundation is to foster charitable giving as well as community commitment and involvement to support the founding principles, mission and vision of…

Health
8
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center

Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center (LMHMC) was founded in 1922 and is a community hospital in Gresham, Oregon with 115 licensed beds. LMHMC offers a wide range of services including family birth, diagnostic services, cancer treatment,…

Health
9
Oregon Medical Association

The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…

—
10
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
11
Salem Health West Valley

To improve the health and well being of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency; the most unlike its peers is Archbishop Francis N Blanchet School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBoys & Girls Club of Salem: $11,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of SalemWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,000 · OtherWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETYSusan G Komen for the Cure: $6,450 · OtherSusan G Komen for the CureGilbert House: $6,100 · OtherGilbert HouseUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $5,700 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION+23 more: $23,649 · Other+23 morePINK LEMONADE PROJECT: $20,000 · Human ServicesPINK LEMONADE PROJECTFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $17,700 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INCFRIENDS OF PIMPOLLO: $12,100 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF PIMPOLLOLIBERTY HOUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesLIBERTY HOUSE+2 more: $1,256 · Human ServicesARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL: $35,500 · EducationARCHBISHOP FRANCI…+1 more: $250 · EducationSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10,000 · HealthSEATTLE C…SANTIAM HOSPITAL AND CLINICS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · HealthSANTIAM H…BENEDICTINE FOUNDATION OF OREGON UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $3,300 · HealthBENEDICTI…SALEM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthSALEM HEA…+1 more: $500 · HealthOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsTHE ASHER HOUSE: $2,500 · AnimalsSALEM HARVEST: $3,500 · Food & NutritionMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionSALEM FIRE FOUNDATION: $3,200 · Public Safety & DisasterOREGON ENERGY FUND: $2,850 · Housing & Shelter
Other$94,899Human Services$55,056Education$35,750Health$19,300Animals$17,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$3,200Housing & Shelter$2,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL: $35,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPINK LEMONADE PROJECT: $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $17,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PIMPOLLO: $12,100 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY HOUSE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM HARVEST: $3,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSANTIAM HOSPITAL AND CLINICS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBENEDICTINE FOUNDATION OF OREGON UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $3,300 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetSALEM FIRE FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOREGON ENERGY FUND: $2,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $1,206 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON ASSOCIATION CHIEFS OF POLICE: $700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OREGON: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PINK LEMONADE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PIMPOLLO ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SALEM HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds SANTIAM HOSPITAL AND CLINICS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE FOUNDATION OF OREGON UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON ENERGY FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE ASHER HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SALEM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON ASSOCIATION CHIEFS OF POLICE ↗
  • Who funds MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR29.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Salem Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Pioneer Trust Bank Na Foundation · Salem Health · Gelco Charitable Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Compton Family Foundation · Willamette Health Council · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency: 81% of income from government
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • The Arc Oregon: 38% of income from government
  • Oregon Association Chiefs of Police: 35% of income from government
  • Liberty House: 23% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Salem Health Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George & Laura Kreitzberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Laura Kreitzberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph