Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George a and Marion M Wilson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$340kHealth$50kRecreation & Sports$50kHousing & Shelter$30kEducation$25kYouth Development$25k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINDERING CENTER$50,000
TREEHOUSE$10,000
DIABETES CAMPING & EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
AMARA$10,000
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING DIFFERENCES$5,000
MERCER ISLAND YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMARA: $15k → 9%AMARA: $15k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$520k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$520k
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KINDERING CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +29%
  • AMARA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +101%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +27%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    KINDERING CENTER — $250,000 · OtherKINDERING CENTERDiabetes Camping & Education Services — $50,000 · OtherDiabetes Camping & Education ServicesMERCER ISLAND YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES — $25,000 · OtherMERCER ISLAND YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICESCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING DIFFER — $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING DIFFERAMARA — $60,000 · Human ServicesAMARAWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $30,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING FAMILY S…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 · HealthChildren's…TREEHOUSE — $30,000 · Youth Development
    Other$350,000Human Services$90,000Health$50,000Youth Development$30,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKINDERING CENTER — $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMARA — $60,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDiabetes Camping & Education Services — $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING DIFFER — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds KINDERING CENTER
    • Who funds AMARA
    • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    • Who funds Diabetes Camping & Education Services
    • Who funds TREEHOUSE
    • Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING DIFFER

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization George a and Marion M Wilson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to George a and Marion M Wilson Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to George a and Marion M Wilson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph