Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gemiluth Chessed of Greater New York Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$589k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$249k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$3.2MFood & Nutrition$1.6MReligion$69kCommunity Improvement$50kEducation$45kHealth$25kPhilanthropy$18kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $474k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD PRESERVATION$248,500
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - KOLLEL POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE$75,000
CITY HARVEST INC$50,000
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$50,000
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA - MORIAH SENIOR CENTERMORIAH LUNCHEON CLUB$40,000
ORTHODOX UNION$35,000
DOROT INC$20,000
SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK: $15k → 20%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $16k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $13k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $13k → 17%DOROT INC: $60k → 17%DOROT INC: $20k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%dorot inc: $10k → 17%Community Service Society: $25k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 16 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$4.7M
$244k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
0%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +75%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $244k · revenue +151%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • BH
    BRYDGE HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $82k
  • M
    MASBIA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -17%
  • TH
    THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG CENTER FOR ELDER JUSTICE
    one grant, 2018 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
2
Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council On Jewish Poverty

Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…

Human Services
3
One Community Nyc Inc

The organization's mission is to reduce inequality and dismantle community divisions in fort greene and clinton hill, brooklyn. it accomplishes this by 1)promoting the broadest distribution of resources in our community, 2) promoting the…

Community Improvement
4
Community Servings Inc

Community servings' mission is to actively engage the community to provide medically tailored, nutritious, scratch-made meals and medically tailored groceries to chronically and critically ill individuals and their families.

Human Services
5
Shorefront Jewish Community Council Inc

To provide a wide range of human and social services to south brooklyn's low-income residents.

Human Services
6
Meals-On-Wheels of New Canaan Inc

Our mission is to ensure that every potential client identified by the town of new canaan or the southwestern connecticut commission on aging, or referred to us by family, friends, medical personnel, or church group will be serviced for as…

Community Improvement
7
Delivering and Servicing the Homebo

Food to poor and elderly

8
City Relief Inc

City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.

Human Services
9
Community Agency for Senior Citizens Inc

The purposes for which community agency for senior citizens (casc) was formed are: (a) to aid and counsel the members of the senior citizen community, as well as others in the city of new york, and particularly in the staten island area…

Human Services
10
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
11
Harvest Home Farmer's Market Inc

Harvest Home Farmers Market provides low-income communities with access to farm fresh local produce and the education to achieve healthier lifestyles.

Food & Nutrition
12
Chestnut Hill Meals On Wheels

Chestnut hill meals on wheels (the organization) is a community based, non profit organization devoted to meeting the daily nutritional needs of any of our neighbors challenged by illness, disability or age. respecting our clients' desire…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Selfhelp Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Telehealth Access for Seniors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JCC OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD PRESERVATION — $1,845,287 · OtherJCC OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD PRESERVATIONAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA - MORIAH SENIOR CENTERMORIAH LUNCHEON CLUB — $320,163 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA - MORIAH SENIOR CENTERMORIAH LUNCHEON CLUBJCC OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD — $305,000 · OtherJCC OF WASHINGTON HEIGHTS & INWOOD+11 more — $587,522 · Other+11 moreCITY HARVEST INC — $1,145,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INCCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $175,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELSMASBIA — $50,000 · Food & NutritionDOROT INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $60,870 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $50,000 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $244,027 · Community ImprovementBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC — $15,000 · HealthTELEHEALTH ACCESS FOR SENIORS — $5,165 · HealthNEUBERGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,057,972Food & Nutrition$1,370,000Human Services$265,870Community Improvement$244,027Health$20,165Philanthropy$17,500Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $1,145,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $244,027 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDOROT INC — $140,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $60,870 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASBIA — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEUBERGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTELEHEALTH ACCESS FOR SENIORS — $5,165 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTRIP ASSIST FOR THE DISABLED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds DOROT INC
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MASBIA
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds NEUBERGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
  • Who funds TELEHEALTH ACCESS FOR SENIORS
  • Who funds TRIP ASSIST FOR THE DISABLED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gemiluth Chessed of Greater New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gemiluth Chessed of Greater New York Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gemiluth Chessed of Greater New York Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph