Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gat Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$484k
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$977kReligion$700kYouth Development$579kPhilanthropy$346kAnimals$323kHealth$300kRecreation & Sports$202kEducation$157kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$600
Median grant
19
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRO KIDS$128,494
OLD GLOBE THEATRE$100,000
NORTH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER INC$96,878
ROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION$35,000
SPCA FOR MONTEREY COUNTY$28,000
WSCGA JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$13,000
KQED$9,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$8,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MONTEREY COUNTY$5,000
PRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
KREITZERS CRITTER CORRAL PUPPYRESCUE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
MERCY CORPS$3,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORPHAN ACRES INC: $200 → 16%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $103 → 21%SOF SUPPORT: $10k → 7%ORPHAN ACRES INC: $100 → 16%SOF SUPPORT: $3k → 7%SOF SUPPORT: $3k → 7%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
PA
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 78 repeat orgs$273k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
57

Total granted

$3.4M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+31%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +88%
  • RB
    ROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +147%
  • OG
    OLD GLOBE THEATRE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LEGACY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $41k · revenue ×13
  • WGBH Educational Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • CF
    Champions for Youth Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
4
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
5
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
10
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
11
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
12
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Alaska Airlines Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/118
Grantees still filing
84/118
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAFUM: $699,180 · OtherNAFUMPRO KIDS: $549,481 · OtherPRO KIDSTHE OLD GLOBE: $540,000 · OtherTHE OLD GLOBECHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATION: $214,100 · OtherCHARLEY HOFFMAN FOUNDATIONKPBS: $131,200 · OtherKPBS+72 more: $292,632 · Other+72 moreSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $234,750 · AnimalsSociety fo…MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $13,300 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $13,200 · Animals+37 more: $72,001 · Animals+37 moreOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $190,000 · Arts & CultureOLD GLOBE…San Diego Opera Association: $55,000 · Arts & CultureSan Diego…WGBH Educational Foundation: $30,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educ…KQED INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC+2 more: $1,199 · Arts & CultureMONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION: $120,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER: $96,878 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $15,000 · Philanthropy+6 more: $9,748 · PhilanthropyROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $500 · Public BenefitCENTURY CLUB CHARITIES INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SCGA FOUNDATION: $64,260 · Recreation & SportsREBEL GOLF FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $1,200 · Recreation & SportsTHE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $41,000 · EducationPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $38,963 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationFUTURE LEGENDS: $3,822 · Education+6 more: $9,744 · Education
Other$2,426,593Animals$333,251Arts & Culture$304,199Philanthropy$241,626Public Benefit$210,500Recreation & Sports$142,960Education$98,529

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $234,750 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $190,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER: $96,878 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCENTURY CLUB CHARITIES INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SCGA FOUNDATION: $64,260 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSan Diego Opera Association: $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $38,963 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChampions for Youth Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSOF SUPPORT INC: $15,260 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $13,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $13,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $11,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPOT: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREBEL GOLF FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSCDRINC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION: $6,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5,195 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Corps: $5,163 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKREITZERS CRITTER CORRAL PUPPYRESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMONTEREY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $3,992 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE LEGENDS: $3,822 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW MEADOWS EQUINE RESCUE AND RETIREMENT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds ROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLD GLOBE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Opera Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Champions for Youth Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOF SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SPOT ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds REBEL GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCDRINC ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO SANTA FE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seckinger Foundation CorporationFL34.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Farrell Family Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · The Joe M & Doris R Dealey Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gat Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gat Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gat Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gat Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gat Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph