Skip to content
Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc

Promote running & track as sports in the tampa bay area to raise funds for charitable organizations which serve youth in the tampa bay area, and to direct and/or sponsor athletic events in the tampa bay area to further the above goals.

$194k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$674kRecreation & Sports$342kEducation$90kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$15kAnimals$7k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $120,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $193,590 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,990 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$173k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF TAMPA PARKS & RECREATION$40,600
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $30k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $4k → 13%HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS: $86k → 13%TAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 13%TAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 13%TAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $74k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $65k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $40k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $40k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $40k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $30k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $18k → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TAMPA BAY: $5k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY: $77k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $70k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $65k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $40k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $40k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $30k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $18k → 13%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY INC: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$957k · 5 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$957k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+77%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $340k · revenue +127%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $312k · revenue +20%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TAMPA RECREATION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $268k · revenue -11%

Funded once

  • HC
    HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $86k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TAMPA PARKS & RECREATION
    one grant, 2017 · $74k
  • CC
    COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: $312,169 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay IncFRIENDS OF TAMPA RECREATION INC: $267,587 · OtherFRIENDS OF TAMPA RECREATION INCHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS: $86,420 · OtherHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLSFRIENDS OF TAMPA PARKS & RECREATION: $74,069 · OtherFRIENDS OF TAMPA PARKS & RECREATION+1 more: $22,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $340,069 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY IN…COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $7,435 · AnimalsThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $4,000 · Education
Other$762,245Youth Development$340,069Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$15,000Animals$7,435Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $340,069 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: $312,169 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF TAMPA RECREATION INC: $267,587 over 7y, 11% of budgetTAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND INC: $15,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TAMPA RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA POLICE MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gasparilla Distance Classic Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gasparilla Distance Classic Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home