· Private foundation
Gary G and Jo Ann White Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of GARY G AND JO ANN WHITE FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOGAN CO CHARITABLE & EDUC FOUND | $26,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE | $10,000 |
| BIG GREEN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
| HOLDEN TWENTY-TWO MINERS MEM FUND | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF HUNTINGTON INC6× · 2017–2022 · $81k · revenue +101%
- ALAPPALACHIAN LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +94%
- LJLARRY JOE HARLESS COMMUNITY CTR FDN INC6× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- HUHAMLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $10k
- ALAPPALACHIAN LEADERSHIP & EDUC FOUNDone grant, 2023 · $9k
- HMHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Scholarships for Higher Education
To provide financial and other support for the dissemination of education in martinsville and henry county, virginia, including but not limited to support of new college institute.
A leader among faith-based universities Eastern Mennonite University emphasizes peace-building creation care experiential learning and intercultural engagement. Founded in 1917 in Harrisonburg Virginia EMU is an educational institution of…
The foundation's purpose is to receive, solicit, accept and hold, administer, invest and disburse property and funds for the educational mission of henderson state university. the foundation provides hsu with resources not provided by…
Promote the social welfare of the people of marshall county, wv by promoting, endorsing, and funding educational programs, services, and activities for students, faculty, admin, parents and families of marshall county
To provide opportunities and financial resources in support of cu-mansfield's mission to be an inclusive comprehensive university that prepares students for personal and professional success in an increasingly complex global environment.
Maintenance of the wvu school of forestry endowment fund
Provide a premier living/learning experience on the campus that ensures student success.
To support the mission of virginia state university by receiving, managing and distributing donations and contributions that aid in the enhancement and growth of the university.
Provide scholarships to west virginia university students
Post secondary school scholarships
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Green Scholarship Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Elite Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG GREEN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LARRY JOE HARLESS COMMUNITY CTR FDN INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds Elite Club ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gary G and Jo Ann White Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gary G and Jo Ann White Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gary G and Jo Ann White Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.